HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
18F
charlie
JavaScript2025–2025
18F / charlie

charlie

18F's Slack bot, Charlie. Built on Bolt

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
46GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

18F's Slack bot, Charlie. Built on Bolt

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by day2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-02-04 09:20:33 UTC to 2025-03-02 00:11:00 UTC.

012025-02-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsFeb 42025-02-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 172025-02-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-03-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-03-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-03-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 2

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Feb 42025-02-04 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-05 00:00:00 UTC101
Feb 52025-02-05 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 62025-02-06 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 72025-02-07 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 82025-02-08 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 92025-02-09 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 102025-02-10 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 112025-02-11 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 122025-02-12 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 132025-02-13 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 142025-02-14 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 152025-02-15 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 162025-02-16 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 172025-02-17 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 182025-02-18 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 192025-02-19 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 202025-02-20 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 212025-02-21 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 222025-02-22 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 232025-02-23 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 242025-02-24 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 252025-02-25 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 262025-02-26 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 272025-02-27 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 282025-02-28 00:00:00 UTC2025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 12025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-03-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 22025-03-02 00:00:00 UTC2025-03-03 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
The tweet the GP linked – https://x.com/lukerosiak/status/1885523747425399247 – mentioned they wrote a Slack bot to lecture people about using inclusive language. I don't think that is average for US tech workers. I don't believe the vast majority of US tech firms have such a thing. I wouldn't call that "far left" myself – although "far left" as used by American conservatives is a pejorative colloquialism whose meaning has shifted from its traditional definition (Trotskyists, Stalinists, Maoists, etc). Not slang I'd use myself but I can understand it. P.S. If you don't trust a tweet from a right-leaning journalist, here's a page from their own GitHub repo about their bot: https://github.com/18F/charlie/blob/main/InclusionBot.md
In GSA Eliminates 18F
The overreaction is absolutely crazy. In no way are they leftist. They are about as woke as any typical modern progressive company. A lot of my colleagues in both public and private sectors include their pronouns in their signatures. They choose to use inclusive language and policies. The big hubbub on X was about the Slack bot that recommends inclusive language. https://github.com/18F/charlie/blob/main/CHANGELOG.inclusion... There is a hit piece article not worth linking that calls out some of the devs who worked there. The comment section of that page is very hateful. As an American it’s shameful to see that level of hate for anything to do with policies of inclusiveness. The company looks like they hire regular people of all types. A few of the adults are trans or identify as queer and they are acknowledged as equal coworkers. Fa
Read the rest
irly representative of the tech industry I’d say. What is so bad about that? They seem to write some excellent code and have a good company culture akin to a lot of SV tech companies.
In The young, inexperienced engineers aiding DOGE

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.