HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
1rgs
claude-code-proxy
Python2025–2025
1rgs / claude-code-proxy

claude-code-proxy

Run Claude Code on OpenAI models

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
3.8KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Run Claude Code on OpenAI models

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 12:54:37 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by day2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-04-16 20:11:56 UTC to 2025-05-05 23:48:56 UTC.

012025-04-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsApr 162025-04-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsApr 252025-04-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMay 5

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Apr 162025-04-16 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-17 00:00:00 UTC101
Apr 172025-04-17 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 182025-04-18 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 192025-04-19 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 202025-04-20 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 212025-04-21 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 222025-04-22 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 232025-04-23 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 242025-04-24 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 252025-04-25 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 262025-04-26 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 272025-04-27 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 282025-04-28 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 292025-04-29 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 302025-04-30 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 12025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-02 00:00:00 UTC000
May 22025-05-02 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-03 00:00:00 UTC000
May 32025-05-03 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-04 00:00:00 UTC000
May 42025-05-04 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC000
May 52025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-06 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
The big step function here seems to be RL on tool calling. Claude 3.7/3.5 are the only models that seem to be able to handle "pure agent" usecases well (agent in a loop, not in an agentic workflow scaffold[0]). OpenAI has made a bet on reasoning models as the core to a purely agentic loop, but it hasn't worked particularly well yet (in my own tests, though folks have hacked a Claude Code workaround[1]). o3-mini has been better at some technical problems than 3.7/3.5 (particularly refactoring, in my experience), but still struggles with long chains of tool calling. My hunch is that these models were tuned _with_ OpenAI Codex[2], which is presumably what Anthropic was doing internally with Claude Code on 3.5/3.7 tl;dr - GPT-3 launched with completions (predict the next token), then OpenAI fine-tuned that model on "chat completions" which th
Read the rest
en led GPT-3.5/GPT-4, and ultimately the success of ChatGPT. This new agent paradigm, requires fine-tuning on the LLM interacting with itself (thinking) and with the outside world (tools), sans any human input. [0]https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/building-effective-age... [1]https://github.com/1rgs/claude-code-proxy [2]https://openai.com/index/openai-codex/
In OpenAI o3 and o4-mini

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.