scantailor-advanced

rder (i.e., blob030 must be an earlier page than blah045; it doesn't matter whether the numbers are contiguous or what the non-numerical characters are). (I use the shell command mmv for convenient renaming.) Import this folder into ScanTailor ( https://github.com/4lex4/scantailor-advanced/releases ), save the project, and run it through all 6 stages. Stage 1 (Fix Orientation): Use the arrow buttons to make sure all text is upright. Use Q and W to move between pages. Stage 2 (Split Pages): You can auto-run this using the |> button, but you should check that the result is correct. It doesn't always detect the page borders correctly. (Again, use Q and W to move between pages.) Stage 3 (Deskew): Auto-run using |>. This is supposed to ensure that all text is correctly rotated. If some text is still skew, you can detect and fix this later. Stage 4 (Select Content): This is about cutting out the margins. This is the most grueling and boring stage of the process. You can auto-run it using |>, but it will often cut off too much and you'll have to painstakingly fix it by hand. Alternatively (and much more quickly), set "Content Box" to "Disable" and manually cut off the most obvious parts without trying to save every single pixel. Don't worry: White space will not inflate the size of the ultimate file; it compresses well. The important thing is to cut off the black/grey parts beyond the pages. In this process, you'll often discover problems with your scan or with previous stages. You can always go back to previous stages to fix them. Stage 5 (Margins): I auto-run this. Stage 6 (Output): This is important to get right. The despeckling algorithm often breaks formulas (e.g., "..."s get misinterpreted as speckles and removed), so I typically uncheck "Despeckle" when scanning anything technical (it's probably fine for fiction). I also tend to uncheck "Savitzki-Golay smoothing" and "Morphological smoothing" for some reason; don't remember why (probably they broke something for me in some case). The "threshold" slider is important: Experiment with it! (Check which value makes a typical page of your book look crisp. Be mindful of pages that are paler or fatter than others. You can set it for each page separately, but most of the time it suffices to find one value for the whole book, except perhaps the cover.) Note the "Apply To..." buttons; they allow you to promote a setting from a single page to the whole book. (Keep in mind that there are two -- the second one is for the despeckling setting.) Now look at the tab on the right of the page. You should see "Output" as the active one, but you can switch to "Fill Zones". This lets you white-out (or black-out) certain regions of the page. This is very useful if you see some speckles (or stupid write-ins, or other imperfections) that need removal. I try not to be perfectionistic: The best way to avoid large speckles is by keeping the scanner clean at the scanning stage; small ones aren't too big a deal; I often avoid this stage unless I know I got something dirty. Some kinds of speckles (particularly those that look like mathematical symbols) can be confusing in a scan. There is also a "Picture Zones" rider for graphics and color; that's beyond my paygrade. Auto-run stage 6 again at the end (even if you think you've done everything -- it needs to recompile the output TIFFs). Now, go to the folder where you have saved your project, and more precisely to its "out/" subfolder. You should see a bunch of .tif files, each one corresponding to a page. Your goal is to collect them into one PDF. I usually do this as follows: tiffcp *.tif ../combined.tif tiff2pdf -o ../combined.pdf ../combined.tif rm -v ../combined.tif Thus you end up with a PDF in the folder in which your project is. Optional: add OCR to it; add bookmarks for chapters and sections; add metadata; correct the page numbering (so that page 1 is actual page 1). I use PDF-XChangeLite for this all; but use whatever tool you know best. At that point, your PDF isn't super-compressed (don't know how to get those), but it's reasonable (about 10MB per 200 pages), and usually the quality is almost professional. Uploading to LibGen... well, I think they've made the UI pretty intuitive these days :) PS. If some of this is out of date or unnecessarily complicated, I'd love to hear!

rithms and don't stand out too much. Not sure how successful that would be, though.

back walk, all notes are dated, numbered, and given a general topic/title as I write them. Once they are scanned, they go into their own pdf file with a long file name that contains the date, title, and keywords that I want to use to find it. If there's a long thread of thought that needs to cross reference multiple files, I've added that information directly to the hand written note with a comment like (these notes use the following results from this date). While not perfect, I've thousands of pages of notes and I've always been able to find what I've been looking for with little effort. I'm not sure anyone else could look at what I've done and search it as effectively because I kind of know how I think about problems and label things, but it works for me. As a couple of other small tidbits: - It takes too long to individually fix each scan using scantailor. A good scanner with a straight scan is *much* better than fixing things by hand. I will do it if I have to, but I'm disappointed in myself when I do. - Slow scanners will kill this methodology and make things too burdensome. Don't use a flatbed scanner. Get a fast scanner with an autofeeder. They are expensive, so expect about $1000. That said, I've scanned tens of thousands of documents on mine and it's never failed, so a good scanner is worth the money in my opinion. - I have thought about using a tablet like remarkable to take notes. My issue is that since I already own the scanner and paper notes are so incredibly robust especially when I'm on travel, I've been unable to justify the money. Though, annotating pdfs may be nice and a scanner doesn't help with that unless we want to print, markup, and then rescan, which is a little wasteful.

d to hear about it as well.