HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
absent1706
sqlalchemy-mixins
Python2017–2018
absent1706 / sqlalchemy-mixins

sqlalchemy-mixins

Active Record, Django-like queries, nested eager load and beauty __repr__ for SQLAlchemy

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
785GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Active Record, Django-like queries, nested eager load and beauty __repr__ for SQLAlchemy

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-04-02 18:58:20 UTC to 2018-07-10 15:15:22 UTC.

012017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsApr 20172017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsNov 20172017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 2018

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Apr 20172017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC110
May 20172017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20172017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20172017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20172017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20172017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20172017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20172017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20172017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 20182018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 20182018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20182018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20182018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20182018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20182018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
ORM are one of those kind of libs where very few ones are great. Python has lots of them, and only SQLAlchemy can be considered of high quality. Not that Django's ORM, peewee or eloquent don't get the job done. But they only cover 80% of the use cases. SQLA gets you to 95%, and you bridge the five remaining percents with raw sql injected in the proper places for those rare projects where the extra is important. The cost of it is that it's a harder to use ORM, and a more verbose one. Which is why I generally use https://github.com/absent1706/sqlalchemy-mixins to make things easier. What's more, ORM for languages like c++ or Rust have it extra hard as they are used from a low level tech while SQL is quite high level and easy to manipulate. It's hence attractive to use it directly. If you use PHP, Ruby or Python, SQL doesn't seem that big of
Read the rest
a gain anymore for the simple operations. Now diesel is quite young, and the rust ecosystem has proven to be moving not only fast, but generally in a sane direction, so I wouldn't count it out just yet. However, I've yet to find an even acceptable JS ORM. Not only do they fail to provide any decent operation beyond simple ones, but they have such poor introspection capabilities that they can't be used to create an ecosystem around them. Which is, after all, __the main point of an ORM__. Avoiding to write SQL is definitively NOT the most important feature of an ORM. The critical one is having a common API you can build upon to create form generators, auth systems, data validation units, serializers, automatic UI, etc. Without this, the case for using an ORM is way weaker.
In Ask HN: Have you ever chosen Postgres over Mongo and regretted it?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.