HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
adafruit
Adafruit_nRF52_Arduino
C2019–2019
adafruit / Adafruit_nRF52_Arduino

Adafruit_nRF52_Arduino

Adafruit code for the Nordic nRF52 BLE SoC on Arduino

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
701GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Adafruit code for the Nordic nRF52 BLE SoC on Arduino

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by day2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2019-06-04 18:37:43 UTC to 2019-07-03 20:45:14 UTC.

012019-06-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 42019-06-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJun 182019-06-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-07-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-07-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-07-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-07-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-07-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 3

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jun 42019-06-04 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-05 00:00:00 UTC101
Jun 52019-06-05 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 62019-06-06 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 72019-06-07 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 82019-06-08 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 92019-06-09 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 102019-06-10 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 112019-06-11 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 122019-06-12 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 132019-06-13 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 142019-06-14 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 152019-06-15 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 162019-06-16 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 172019-06-17 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 182019-06-18 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 192019-06-19 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 202019-06-20 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 212019-06-21 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 222019-06-22 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 232019-06-23 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 242019-06-24 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 252019-06-25 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 262019-06-26 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 272019-06-27 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 282019-06-28 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 292019-06-29 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 302019-06-30 00:00:00 UTC2019-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 12019-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-07-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 22019-07-02 00:00:00 UTC2019-07-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 32019-07-03 00:00:00 UTC2019-07-04 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
I think you are understating the current power of microcontrollers. They can run Python. You get a REPL. The days of 8 bit micros for hobbyists are over; 32 bit micros that are hundreds of times more powerful in terms of CPU, memory, flash, and APIs cost the exact same amount. https://learn.adafruit.com/welcome-to-circuitpython/what-is-... Here is a HomeKit device on a nrf52: https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_nRF52_Arduino/blob/mast... The library situation is pretty good these days. You can talk to TLS-enabled web servers. You can talk to Bluetooth devices. You can integrate sensors with a couple lines of code. It isn't trivial but it isn't hard either. The advantage of using a microcontroller is that you don't have to stress out about all the other things that a computer is going to be doing. You don't have to write systemd c
Read the rest
onfigurations to start your application at boot. You don't have to prevent syslog from ruining your SD card. You don't have to update the Linux kernel when there is a 0day. You don't have to work hard to power the machine from a battery. (I have a Bluetooth-based temperature/humidity/pressure logger + epaper clock that runs off a 100mAh LiPo battery. A Raspberry Pi that isn't even turned on would suck that thing dry in 3 hours, not counting power loss in the boost converter that would be required.) The advantage of using a Raspberry Pi is that you get a ton more CPU power and all the advantages of a computer. Your GPIO sensors can show their data on 2 4k screens. You can browse the web with Chrome. You can run complex software trivially. They are both great for different use cases. I think someone that wants to make a tiny robot or blinky light would be better served by an $8 M0-based Arduino clone. I think someone that wants to run image recognition on a video feed would be better served by a Raspberry Pi. The power level of the Pi is greater than a micro. Getting something simple working perfectly without any future maintenance is easier on a micro.
In Pi-Top 4
I absolutely love Adafruit tech for low-volume hardware hacking projects. Particularly the Feather nRF52832 [0]: onboard flash, Bluetooth Low Energy, a 5V-to-3.3V converter, and USB battery charging all in one little off-the-shelf board. And the runtime [1] and bootloader [2] are totally open! I'm tinkering with my own little fork to add signed updates, lock down the OTA DFU mechanism, and switch to a more secure BLE pairing mode. By the way, if anyone knows of an alternative to the RedBear Nano V2 [3] in terms of form factor and power profile, please let me know, since Particle is sadly killing that board off after buying out RedBear. Glad I don't have to worry about that with Adafruit. [0] https://www.adafruit.com/product/3406 [1] https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_nRF52_Arduino [2] https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_nRF52_Bootloade
Read the rest
In Adafruit Founder Limor Fried: Open-Source Hardware Revolution [video]

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.