HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
adamhaile
S-array
JavaScript2018–2018
adamhaile / S-array

S-array

Utility methods for working with arrays in S.js

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
35GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Utility methods for working with arrays in S.js

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 10:02:42 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-02-16 17:50:32 UTC to 2018-06-14 04:36:33 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012018-02-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsFeb 122018-02-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-03-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-03-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-03-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-03-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-04-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-04-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-04-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-04-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-04-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsApr 92018-04-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-04-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-04-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-04-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-04-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-05-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-05-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-05-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-05-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-05-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-05-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-05-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-05-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 11

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Feb 122018-02-12 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-19 00:00:00 UTC101
Feb 192018-02-19 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 262018-02-26 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 52018-03-05 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 122018-03-12 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 192018-03-19 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 262018-03-26 00:00:00 UTC2018-04-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 22018-04-02 00:00:00 UTC2018-04-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 92018-04-09 00:00:00 UTC2018-04-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 162018-04-16 00:00:00 UTC2018-04-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 232018-04-23 00:00:00 UTC2018-04-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 302018-04-30 00:00:00 UTC2018-05-07 00:00:00 UTC000
May 72018-05-07 00:00:00 UTC2018-05-14 00:00:00 UTC000
May 142018-05-14 00:00:00 UTC2018-05-21 00:00:00 UTC000
May 212018-05-21 00:00:00 UTC2018-05-28 00:00:00 UTC000
May 282018-05-28 00:00:00 UTC2018-06-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 42018-06-04 00:00:00 UTC2018-06-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 112018-06-11 00:00:00 UTC2018-06-18 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

1 sources
> MobX strives to implement transparent reactive programming, where the way you access, update and transform values works exactly like it would with regular objects. S.js has a worse learning curve. Hardly: reactive values are get/set functions, and you create new ones with S(() => ...). That's it. MobX's attempt at transparency yields inescapable and surprising corner cases. > Redundant computations are computed; [...] even though the completed() computed isn't used anywhere, the reduction is still being recomputed every time todo state changes Incorrect. The todos binding is an SArray not a regular array [1]. See my modified version where I log the events to the console [2]. [1] https://github.com/adamhaile/S-array [2] https://codepen.io/anon/pen/KQyOyZ
In Promises are not neutral enough

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.