ESesafak·May 11, 2026
That's looks like a fair bit of ceremony for what it does. Is this representative of the output? https://github.com/adamjgmiller/adamsreview/pull/3
In Show HN: adamsreview – better multi-agent PR reviews for Claude Codeadamjgmiller
adamsreview
Shell2026–2026
adamjgmiller / adamsreview
adamsreview
Multi-lens code review pipeline for Claude Code: deep review (Claude or Codex), auto-fix loop, interactive walkthrough, external-finding injection.
2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
245GitHub stars
What to know before exploring
What it is
Multi-lens code review pipeline for Claude Code: deep review (Claude or Codex), auto-fix loop, interactive walkthrough, external-finding injection.
GitHub
Where it is used
No documented product use has been verified yet.
What people are saying
No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.
No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.
Also in these discussions
No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.
This week on Hacker News
Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.
No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.
Mentions over time
HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions
Observed mentions: 2026-05-11 02:06:29 UTC to 2026-05-11 04:50:24 UTC.
Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.
View mention counts and date ranges
| Period | Start (UTC) | End (exclusive, UTC) | Mentions | Submissions | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 02:00 | 2026-05-11 02:00:00 UTC | 2026-05-11 03:00:00 UTC | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| May 11, 03:00 | 2026-05-11 03:00:00 UTC | 2026-05-11 04:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| May 11, 04:00 | 2026-05-11 04:00:00 UTC | 2026-05-11 05:00:00 UTC | 1 | 0 | 1 |
What Hacker News says
2 sourcesShow HN: adamsreview – better multi-agent PR reviews for Claude Code
I built adamsreview, a Claude Code plugin that runs deeper, multi-stage PR reviews using parallel sub-agents, validation passes, persistent JSON state, and optional ensemble review via Codex CLI and PR bot comments.
On my own PRs, it has been catching dramatically more real bugs than Claude’s built-in /review, /ultrareview, CodeRabbit, Greptile, and Codex’s built-in review, while producing fewer false positives.
adamsreview is six Claude Code slash commands packaged as a plugin: review, codex-review, add, promote, walkthrough, and fix. I modeled it after the built-in /review command and extended it meaningfully.
You can clear context between review stages because state is stored in JSON artifacts on disk, with built-in scripts for keeping it updated.
The walkthrough command uses Claude’s AskUserQuestion feature to walk you through uncerta
Read the rest
in findings or items needing human review one by one. Then, the fix command dispatches per-fix-group agents and re-reviews the work with Opus, reverting any regressions before committing survivors.
It runs against your regular Claude Code subscription (Max plan recommended), unlike /ultrareview, which charges against your Extra Usage pool.
I would love feedback from Claude Code users, pro devs, and anyone with strong opinions about AI code reviews.
Repo: https://github.com/adamjgmiller/adamsreview
Install:
/plugin marketplace add adamjgmiller/adamsreview, /plugin install adamsreview@adamsreview