HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
adelsz
pgtyped
TypeScript2019–2025
adelsz / pgtyped

pgtyped

pgTyped - Typesafe SQL in TypeScript

18Distinct people
25Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
3.3KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

pgTyped - Typesafe SQL in TypeScript

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year25 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2019-09-29 17:05:36 UTC to 2025-10-05 11:17:13 UTC.

02462019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 1 submissions, 5 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 0 submissions, 7 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 0 submissions, 6 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC615
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC707
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC606
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

25 sources
There is an implementation of SQL that operates on a table shaped type, entirely at type level. For your amusement: https://github.com/codemix/ts-sql There are a bunch of more practical takes that codegen types from your database and generate types for your queries, eg: https://github.com/adelsz/pgtyped To me the second approach seems much more pragmatic because you don’t need to run a SQL parser in your typechecker interpreter on every build
In Type-Safe Printf() in TypeScript
I'm slowly moving in that direction. Recently started using (pg-typed)[1] in our projects and its amazing, as it gives you the types from the database into typescript, and not the "general types from tables", but the exact specific types for each individual query. Coupled with the same thing going the other direction where we get types from our api contracts (OpenAPI/Swagger) with (laminar)[2] means that our app is very close to the "if it compiles it will run" territory. ORMs do give you a lot of convenience though. Things like "run this additional query every time you request this entity" thing for example like for logical delete, which is unpleasant to replicate in your database. But Postgres is so freaking powerful its more of the fact that we don't know how to do it properly than it not offering a good solution. [1] https://github.co
Read the rest
In SQLBolt – Interactive lessons and exercises to learn SQL
> A huge benefit of TypeORM is that you get full static type support in all of your queries, including in the returned results. When did I say I wanted to give up static typing? You can have both[1][2]. I would never give up static typing and would not have used Node if TypeScript/Flow were unavailable. > TypeORM in particular is well designed and quite awesome. I've used TypeORM extensively in production on multiple projects for years, including with a fairly large team. It has silent failures, and its API was unstable/unclear for a long time. It's been a very messy project for most of its lifetime. They couldn't even decide on an API for lazy-loading of relations, and there was some hidden API that was semi-supported and not type-checked. Partly because it's built on Node, it's very difficult to use a debugger to see the relevant frames
Read the rest
when you hit a breakpoint or an exception -- if you can even set a breakpoint where you want it to be before just running into an error at runtime. There's also the same core issue that all ORMs suffer from, which is that the abstraction becomes leaky as soon as you need to do anything complicated with lots of joins or advanced SQL features. 1. https://github.com/adelsz/pgtyped 2. https://jawj.github.io/zapatos/
In DenoDB

Showing the 15 most recent of 25 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.