HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
adtac
commento
Go2017–2021
adtac / commento

commento

A fast, bloat-free comments platform (Github mirror)

13Distinct people
27Mentions
2Explicit recommenders
3.8KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A fast, bloat-free comments platform (Github mirror)

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

Seeing the current $70/month for 250,000 page views definitely turned me away (did I read that right? weird decimal place in your copy: 250000.00), but I might not be your…

rewq4321 used a recommendation phrase. 2 indexed comments match. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year27 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-04-24 20:09:19 UTC to 2021-02-05 07:36:14 UTC.

051015202017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 20 mentions; 4 submissions, 16 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2021

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC20416
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

27 sources
rewq4321·Feb 1, 2020Recommendation phrase
Seeing the current $70/month for 250,000 page views definitely turned me away (did I read that right? weird decimal place in your copy: 250000.00), but I might not be your target audience. If you do lower the price, just make sure it's long-term sustainable. $5 for 5 million page loads (if that's what you mean in your comment above) would be great, and something I'd consider (since the alternative for me is setting up a $5 DO droplet with schnack[0] or commento[1]) but that might be a bit too cheap depending on the costs on your side (e.g. fighting spam). Might be worth looking at competitors' pricing for inspiration. A lot of developer types would most likely choose your service over disqus even if you're a bit more expensive, simply because of all the bloat and tracking and shady behavior of disqus. That would be too expensive for me, b
Read the rest
ut like I said, I might not be your target audience. I love the simple setup and that you're focused on performance and not spying on users! If the pricing gets adjusted, I would seriously consider adding it to some of my sites. Oh, if you're not going to make it open source, then an "export" feature is crucial for me, because I despise lock-in. [0]: https://schnack.cool/ [1]: https://github.com/adtac/commento
In Show HN: FastComments
Shameless plug: my own alternative to Disqus: https://github.com/adtac/commento There's also a hosted service I've been building for the past five months, if you don't want to bother with setting up and maintaining servers, but also don't want your readers to be mercilessly tracked by Disqus and their endless tracking partners. It's currently in private beta, but I'd be glad to invite anyone reading this (as a bonus, you'll get a lifetime free subscription for beta testing); shoot me an email (address in profile) :)
In A more privacy-friendly blog
The topic of Disqus alternatives comes up every once in a while on HN, so I was thinking about inviting the people working on Disqus alternatives to my chat room and have a conversation about their projects and the comments space in general and write a lightly edited blog post based on the chat. Here are some of the people I plan to talk to: * `foxhop of https://www.remarkbox.com/ * `adtac of https://github.com/adtac/commento * `KajMagnus of https://www.effectivediscussions.org/ * The person behind Isso * The person behind https://github.com/schn4ck/schnack * Aja of Civil Comments (it shut down recently https://medium.com/@aja_15265/saying-goodbye-to-civil-commen... ) * And of course, my own https://www.hostedcomments.com/ We actually had the first discussion in the chat room (though we went off topic very quickly), you can read it here h
Read the rest
ttps://www.hackerschat.net/topics/general/chat/archive/?dat... There are a few opinions people have about this space, some feel going ad-supported is the only way, others feel bootstrapped operations are sustainable and there are others who feel there's no money in this space. If you have any questions that you would like me to ask the people mentioned above let me know here or in my chat room https://www.hackerschat.net/
In Isso – a commenting server similar to Disqus
Built Commento, a privacy-focused alternative to Disqus: https://github.com/adtac/commento Right now, it exists as a Github project that you can self-host, but I'll soon offer it as a paid service if you don't want to host and maintain servers on your own. (And maybe even apply to YC, who knows :)) It started out with me reading a blog post [1] and thinking "I can write Disqus tonight". And that's how it began; I had a working prototype in 24 hours (at the expense of a final exam I had in two days haha). Posted it on HN, and it blew up. And then I sat down and made it into a serious project that's now actually used by other people. I've had senior devs from huge companies (like Atlassian) contribute to the project, and I think that's amazing. http://donw.io/post/github-comments/
In Ask HN: What did you work on in 2017?
> Why do they expect me to be able to use Docker by default? Because it's easier to follow the instructions for installing Docker once, than to follow the instructions for each piece of software you might want to install. > Is there any common knowledge of extracting a software > package out of such "dockerized" projects that I don't > know of? Have you tried just following the commands in the DockerFile? The DockerFile for the project you mentioned looks a lot like the Install.md that I presume you want. https://github.com/adtac/commento/blob/master/Dockerfile
In Ask HN: Why are some projects defaulting to Docker for public use?

Ask HN: Why are some projects defaulting to Docker for public use?

Hi HN! I'm a bit old school, wanting to run my software packages from OS repos or compiling them myself, creating aliases for them and such. Recently, I have encountered a bunch of great open source projects that just say "Docker run" this in order to use it. Why do they expect me to be able to use Docker by default? Even for really simple projects with not a lot of dependancies. Example: https://github.com/adtac/commento#getting-started Isn't it a major selling point of Go to be able to ship single binaries that "just run"? Why enforce Docker on users? To my eyes, it looks like I'm expected to run a (fast/quick)VM for every software package in an operating system. Why? Is there any common knowledge of extracting a software package out of such "dockerized" projects that I don't know of? Any educating in this respect is appreciated.
7 points · Open discussion
All (?) upcoming alternatves to Disqus: (my own listed last) - Mozilla's Talk, https://github.com/coralproject/talk. Open source, install yourself. - Discourse, https://www.discourse.org/. One needs to navigate to a separate page, to post a comment. Not threaded. Min $20/month. Open source. Facebook and Gmail login. - Isso: https://posativ.org/isso/. Open source, install on your own server. - Commento, https://github.com/adtac/commento. Open source. Moderation, spam-protection and hosting is under development. - Schnack, https://www.vis4.net/blog/2017/10/hello-schnack/. Open source, install yourself. Has GitHub and Facebook login. - HostedComments, https://www.hostedcomments.com/. Proprietory. Min $10/month - Remarbox, https://www.remarkbox.com/. Proprietory. Min $4/month - Gitalk. https://github.com/gitalk/gitalk. Open source, install yo
Read the rest
urself. Comments stored as GitHub issues. - https://github.com/skx/e-comments. Open source, install yourself. - And my own: EffectiveDiscussions: https://www.effectivediscussions.org/blog-comments. Open source, or $2 per month. Has Facebook and Gmail login.
In Zeta Global acquires Disqus (YC S07)

Showing the 15 most recent of 27 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.