HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
Agenta-AI
agenta
TypeScript2023–2026
Agenta-AI / agenta

agenta

Agenta is a workspace where you and your team build agents and automations.

2Distinct people
13Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
4.9KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Agenta is a workspace where you and your team build agents and automations.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year13 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-07-19 11:55:38 UTC to 2026-09-29 18:30:11 UTC.

02462023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 1 submissions, 6 comments20242025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC716
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

13 sources
LeonTung·Aug 23, 2024Submission

Show HN: PromptDoggy – Prompt Management for Product and Engineering Teams

Hi HN, We’re Leon and Jingrui, and we’re excited to share our project: PromptDoggy. It’s a prompt management tool designed to streamline collaboration between product and engineering teams when building LLM apps. Key features: - Prompt management dashboard for product managers: Product managers can write prompts and deploy them to different environments, such as development or production. - APIs for engineers to fetch prompts: Engineers can retrieve prompts by name through the API. - Copilot textarea: Inspired by GitHub Copilot, we implemented a similar experience to see if it could benefit product managers. - Static prompts: For prompts that don’t change often, such as system prompts, you can mark them as static. This allows filtering in the API and caching during the CI process. - Hosting prompts on S3 and accessing them through CloudFr
Read the rest
ont: This setup provides faster access and enables you to host PromptDoggy on a low-cost server without worrying about concurrency issues. - Encryption: All prompts are encrypted in the database and are client-encrypted when uploaded to S3. We believe prompts are a vital secret for any LLM app, with PMs and engineers spending countless hours tweaking and testing them. We want to ensure they are secure and inaccessible to others. Why we built it: We’re both product managers (I was an engineer before). We had an idea about a product manager copilot and worked on it for a while before moving on. 1. Prompt collaboration challenges: Jingrui designed the prompts, and I had to manually copy and paste them into my code before testing and deploying. This back-and-forth process was inefficient and frustrating. 2. Difficulty managing prompts: As we developed rapidly, prompts were scattered throughout the code, leading to duplication and hardcoding. This made management and debugging a nightmare. Eventually, I wrote a PromptManager class to centralize and organize prompts using a hash map. Why I chose Ruby despite the AI trend toward Python: Ruby and Rails make me happy. I first encountered Ruby while working as an SDE at Udacity, responsible for our payment system. Before that, I was a Golang engineer. I was fascinated by the magic of Rails and felt energized when writing apps with it. While Python might be more convenient in the short term, I believe this happiness will sustain me for much longer and help me contribute more to the community. Inspirations: There are some fantastic products in this field that I really respect: - https://github.com/Agenta-AI/agenta - https://github.com/pezzolabs/pezzo - https://humanloop.com/ I also want to thank CopilotKit (https://github.com/CopilotKit/CopilotKit) for teaching me the philosophy of implementing a copilot textarea. I wish I could have used the project directly, but integrating just one React component into Rails while keeping importmap and StimulusJS was quite challenging. Given the limited time, I decided to move on with StimulusJS. This is our first time building an open-source project to share with the world, and we’re a bit nervous about it. We’d love to hear your thoughts. If you’re facing any problems related to this field, feel free to schedule a quick call or email us.
2 points · Open discussion
Agenta | Hybrid (Berlin) | Full Time Agenta is an open-source LLM developer platform that provides all the necessary tools for rapidly building reliable LLM applications. Features include prompt management, evaluation, human feedback, and observability. Find out more about us at https://github.com/agenta-ai/agenta Our tech stack includes Python, FastAPI, MongoDB, Typescript, ReactJS, and NextJS. We are hiring: Founding Product Engineer - Frontend: Ideally, you have previously worked in early-stage startups, can manage features from design to production, and have some background in LLMs. You can find more details about this role here: https://agentaai.notion.site/Founding-Product-Engineer-Front... If you're interested, please contact us directly at: careers@agenta.ai
In Ask HN: Who is hiring? (July 2024)
Agenta | Hybrid (Berlin) or Remote (CET +/- 5) | Multiple Roles | Full Time Agenta is an open-source LLM developer platform that provides all the necessary tools for rapidly building reliable LLM applications. Features include prompt management, evaluation, human feedback, and observability. Find out more about us at https://github.com/agenta-ai/agenta Our tech stack includes Python, FastAPI, MongoDB, Typescript, ReactJS, and NextJS. We have several positions available: Founding Product Engineer - Frontend: Ideally, you have previously worked in early-stage startups, can manage features from design to production, and have some background in LLMs. Founding Product Designer: This role is perfect for someone who has experience designing complex B2B products, ideally developer tools. You can find more details about these roles here: https://a
Read the rest
gentaai.notion.site/Careers-at-agenta-fb8a76d4d9044... If you're interested, please contact us directly at: careers@agenta.ai
In Ask HN: Who is hiring? (June 2024)
I am biased, but I would use a platform and not roll your own solution. You will tend to underestimate the depth of capabilities needed for an eval framework. Now for solutions, shameless plug here, we are building an open-source platform for experimenting and evaluating complex LLM apps (https://github.com/agenta-ai/agenta). We offer automatic evaluators as well as human annotation capabilities. Currently, we only provide testing before deployment, but we have plans to include post-production evaluations as well. Other tools I would look at in the space are promptfoo (also open-source, more dev oriented), humanloop (one of the most feature complete tools in the space, enterprise oriented), however more enterprise oriented / costly) and vellum (YC company, more focused towards product teams)
In Ask HN: How are you testing your LLM applications?
Shameless promotion, I might have the tool for that :) https://github.com/agenta-ai/agenta We're building a platform for evaluating prompts (and more complex LLM workflows). From what we've seen from users, the results for prompts are highly stochastic. It's hard to make generalizations. For example, a user building a sales assistant discovered that by simply changing the order of the sentences in the prompt, the accuracy improved significantly.
In Show HN: A simple ChatGPT prompt builder

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.