HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
Agentic-Systems-Lab
rigorous
Python2025–2025
Agentic-Systems-Lab / rigorous

rigorous

A comprehensive suite of tools, built to liberate science by making the creation, evaluation, and dissemination of research more transparent, affordable, and efficient.

3Distinct people
7Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
253GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A comprehensive suite of tools, built to liberate science by making the creation, evaluation, and dissemination of research more transparent, affordable, and efficient.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 2:59:58 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour7 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-05-31 13:51:16 UTC to 2025-06-01 03:01:37 UTC.

01232025-05-31 13:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsMay 31, 13:002025-05-31 14:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-31 15:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-31 16:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-31 17:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-31 18:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-05-31 19:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2025-05-31 20:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMay 31, 20:002025-05-31 21:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-31 22:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-05-31 23:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-01 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-01 01:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-01 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-01 02:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-01 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-01 03:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-01 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 1, 03:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
May 31, 13:002025-05-31 13:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 14:00:00 UTC110
May 31, 14:002025-05-31 14:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 15:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 15:002025-05-31 15:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 16:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 16:002025-05-31 16:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 17:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 17:002025-05-31 17:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 18:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 18:002025-05-31 18:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 19:00:00 UTC101
May 31, 19:002025-05-31 19:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 20:00:00 UTC303
May 31, 20:002025-05-31 20:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 21:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 21:002025-05-31 21:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 22:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 22:002025-05-31 22:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 23:00:00 UTC101
May 31, 23:002025-05-31 23:00:00 UTC2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 1, 00:002025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-01 01:00:00 UTC000
Jun 1, 01:002025-06-01 01:00:00 UTC2025-06-01 02:00:00 UTC000
Jun 1, 02:002025-06-01 02:00:00 UTC2025-06-01 03:00:00 UTC000
Jun 1, 03:002025-06-01 03:00:00 UTC2025-06-01 04:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

1 sources
rjakob·May 31, 2025Submission

Show HN: AI Peer Reviewer – Multiagent system for scientific manuscript analysis

After waiting 8 months for a journal response or two months for co-author feedback that consisted of "looks good" and a single comma change, we built an AI-powered peer review system that helps researchers improve their manuscripts rapidly before submission. The system uses multiple specialized agents to analyze different aspects of scientific papers, from methodology to writing quality. Key features: 24 specialized agents analyzing sections, scientific rigor, and writing quality // Detailed feedback with actionable recommendations. // PDF report generation. // Support for custom review criteria and target journals. Two ways to use it: 1. Cloud version (free during testing): https://www.rigorous.company - Upload your manuscript - Get a comprehensive PDF report within 1–2 working days - No setup required 2. Self-hosted version (GitHub):
Read the rest
https://github.com/robertjakob/rigorous - Use your own OpenAI API keys - Full control over the review process - Customize agents and criteria - MIT licensed The system is particularly useful for researchers preparing manuscripts before submission to co-authors or target journals. Would love to get feedback from the HN community, especially from PhDs and researchers across all academic fields. The project is open source and we welcome contributions! GitHub: https://github.com/robertjakob/rigorous Cloud version: https://www.rigorous.company
108 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.