HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
Agentic-Systems-Lab
rigorous
Python2025–2025
Agentic-Systems-Lab / rigorous

rigorous

A comprehensive suite of tools, built to liberate science by making the creation, evaluation, and dissemination of research more transparent, affordable, and efficient.

3Distinct people
7Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
253GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A comprehensive suite of tools, built to liberate science by making the creation, evaluation, and dissemination of research more transparent, affordable, and efficient.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 2:04:58 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour7 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-05-31 13:51:16 UTC to 2025-06-01 03:01:37 UTC.

01232025-05-31 13:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsMay 31, 13:002025-05-31 14:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-31 15:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-31 16:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-31 17:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-31 18:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-05-31 19:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2025-05-31 20:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMay 31, 20:002025-05-31 21:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-31 22:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-31 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-05-31 23:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-01 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-01 01:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-01 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-01 02:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-01 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-01 03:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-01 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 1, 03:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
May 31, 13:002025-05-31 13:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 14:00:00 UTC110
May 31, 14:002025-05-31 14:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 15:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 15:002025-05-31 15:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 16:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 16:002025-05-31 16:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 17:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 17:002025-05-31 17:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 18:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 18:002025-05-31 18:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 19:00:00 UTC101
May 31, 19:002025-05-31 19:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 20:00:00 UTC303
May 31, 20:002025-05-31 20:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 21:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 21:002025-05-31 21:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 22:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 22:002025-05-31 22:00:00 UTC2025-05-31 23:00:00 UTC101
May 31, 23:002025-05-31 23:00:00 UTC2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 1, 00:002025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-01 01:00:00 UTC000
Jun 1, 01:002025-06-01 01:00:00 UTC2025-06-01 02:00:00 UTC000
Jun 1, 02:002025-06-01 02:00:00 UTC2025-06-01 03:00:00 UTC000
Jun 1, 03:002025-06-01 03:00:00 UTC2025-06-01 04:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
No worries, I appreciate that you took the time to read and respond! When I first read "Originality and Contribution" at [1], I actually assumed it was a plagiarism check. It did not occur to me until now that you were referring to novelty with that. Similarly, I assumed "Impact and Significance" referred to more about whether the subject was appropriate for a given journal or not (would readers of this journal find this information significant/relevant/impactful or should it be published elsewhere?). That's a question that many journals do ask of referees, independent of overall novelty, but I see how you mean a different aspect of novelty instead. I'm not opposed to testing your system with a manuscript of my own, but currently the one manuscript that I have approaching publication is still in the internal review stage at my national
Read the rest
lab, and I don't know precisely when it will be ready for external submission. But I'll keep it in mind whenever it passes all of the internal checks. [1] https://github.com/robertjakob/rigorous/blob/main/Agent1_Pee...
In Show HN: AI Peer Reviewer – Multiagent system for scientific manuscript analysis

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.