ArtSpew

They're might be talking about this[0] as it has been popular recently. It can definitely do >60 imgs/s on my 3080Ti, but you're not going to want any of those images. They are absolute garbage.[1] I can do a little under an image a second and some may be quite usable, but nowhere near what you're going to get from the standard model. [0] https://github.com/aifartist/ArtSpew/ [1] but the project is still cool, just context...

> I found this claiming an A100 can generate 1 image/s. The article you linked is over a year old. Needless to say there have been a LOT of optimizations in the last year. Back then it was common to use 50+ steps for many of the common samplers. Current methods use a few steps like 1. This OnnxStream are using SDXL-turbo, and you can combine LCM and a few other methods to go very fast. The reason it's so much faster now is the OnnxStream is only using a single step. This repo claims 149 images/s on a 4090 https://github.com/aifartist/ArtSpew However even if you only get 1 image/s with whatever GPU you have I stand by my original statement that unless you want to do it for the cool factor (which is very valid), pre-calculating them makes more sense.