WYwyoung2·Oct 11, 2016
> Why that annoying commit hashes are so big?
In most places, Fossil shows an abbreviated form of the hash, typically 8-10 characters since Fossil, like Git, will accept any unique prefix of an artifact hash to refer to that artifact.
Here is a GitHub commit page:
https://github.com/aioutecism/amVim-for-VSCode/commits/master
and here is a Fossil timeline page, which serves much the same purpose:
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline
In the fossil case, the hashes are one character longer, and enclosed in square brackets instead of a roundrect.
This is a serious complaint?
> Do you really read them first?
No, you ignore them completely until you need to refer to one, and then you copy-paste it, just like with Git.
> every button and label have meaningful place and polished
Which button or label in the default Fossil skin is not i
Read the rest
n a meaningful place, and which shows a lack of polish? Be specific.
> they forgot to hire a designer.
I'm pretty sure the differences between the two stem not from forgetfulness but from the fact that GitHub, Inc. employs 608 people, is closed source, and has a revenue model, whereas Fossil is a side project of a company that's probably 1/100 that size and grows mainly by open source user code contributions.