The discussion centers on ISponsorBlockTV as a solution for skipping in-video ads, with users contrasting its effectiveness against dynamic podcast advertising and debating the ethical implications of bypassing creator revenue. Participants also highlight technical limitations, such as the tool's incompatibility with mobile platforms and confusion regarding its scope versus the official YouTube TV service.
62 readable replies · Supporting reply 1 · Supporting reply 2 · Supporting reply 3 · Supporting reply 4SponsorBlock
Skip YouTube video sponsors (browser extension)
What to know before exploring
What it is
Skip YouTube video sponsors (browser extension)
GitHub
Where it is used
No documented product use was verified in the last source check.
What people are saying
No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.
No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.
Also in these discussions
No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.
This week on Hacker News
Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.
Commenters dispute the assertion that Wikipedia-like projects are unrepeatable by citing ongoing crowdsourced growth, while others argue that corporate capture and AI data scraping are eroding the necessary conditions for such neutrality. A significant disagreement persists over whether large language models offer verifiable improvements over human moderation or merely replicate existing power imbalances and opacity.
459 readable replies · Supporting reply 1 · Supporting reply 2 · Supporting reply 3 · Supporting reply 4Mentions over time
Observed mentions: 2019-08-23 18:38:18 UTC to 2026-07-09 06:34:07 UTC.
* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.
Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.
View mention counts and date ranges
| Period | Start (UTC) | End (exclusive, UTC) | Mentions | Submissions | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| 2020 | 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 2021 | 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 8 | 2 | 6 |
| 2023 | 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| 2024 | 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| 2025 | 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| 2026 (partial) | 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 3 | 0 | 3 |
From the project README
An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 13, 2026.
Read the project’s introduction
What Hacker News says
42 sourcesShowing the 15 most recent of 42 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.