HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
alexmojaki
sorcery
Python2025–2025
alexmojaki / sorcery

sorcery

Dark magic delights in Python

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
430GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Dark magic delights in Python

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 3-hour interval3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-07-12 11:59:11 UTC to 2025-07-14 20:28:21 UTC.

012025-07-12 09:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-12 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 12, 09:002025-07-12 12:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-12 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-12 15:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-12 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-12 18:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-12 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-12 21:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-13 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-13 03:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-13 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-07-13 06:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-13 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-13 09:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-13 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-13 12:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-13 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJul 13, 12:002025-07-13 15:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-13 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-13 18:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-13 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-13 21:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-14 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-14 03:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-14 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-14 06:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-14 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-14 09:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-14 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-14 12:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-14 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-14 15:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-14 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-14 18:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-14 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 14, 18:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jul 12, 09:002025-07-12 09:00:00 UTC2025-07-12 12:00:00 UTC101
Jul 12, 12:002025-07-12 12:00:00 UTC2025-07-12 15:00:00 UTC000
Jul 12, 15:002025-07-12 15:00:00 UTC2025-07-12 18:00:00 UTC000
Jul 12, 18:002025-07-12 18:00:00 UTC2025-07-12 21:00:00 UTC000
Jul 12, 21:002025-07-12 21:00:00 UTC2025-07-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 13, 00:002025-07-13 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-13 03:00:00 UTC000
Jul 13, 03:002025-07-13 03:00:00 UTC2025-07-13 06:00:00 UTC101
Jul 13, 06:002025-07-13 06:00:00 UTC2025-07-13 09:00:00 UTC000
Jul 13, 09:002025-07-13 09:00:00 UTC2025-07-13 12:00:00 UTC000
Jul 13, 12:002025-07-13 12:00:00 UTC2025-07-13 15:00:00 UTC000
Jul 13, 15:002025-07-13 15:00:00 UTC2025-07-13 18:00:00 UTC000
Jul 13, 18:002025-07-13 18:00:00 UTC2025-07-13 21:00:00 UTC000
Jul 13, 21:002025-07-13 21:00:00 UTC2025-07-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 14, 00:002025-07-14 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-14 03:00:00 UTC000
Jul 14, 03:002025-07-14 03:00:00 UTC2025-07-14 06:00:00 UTC000
Jul 14, 06:002025-07-14 06:00:00 UTC2025-07-14 09:00:00 UTC000
Jul 14, 09:002025-07-14 09:00:00 UTC2025-07-14 12:00:00 UTC000
Jul 14, 12:002025-07-14 12:00:00 UTC2025-07-14 15:00:00 UTC000
Jul 14, 15:002025-07-14 15:00:00 UTC2025-07-14 18:00:00 UTC000
Jul 14, 18:002025-07-14 18:00:00 UTC2025-07-14 21:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
Destructuring/unpacking and packing add more to the language than whatever crap they stuff into every new python release these days. Let's never forget they _removed_ in its entirety a standard library package, that is the level we are dealing with here... Not saying it needs to be done with the decoder hack, it should have proper compiler support, but it's basically necessary. It's the best feature in JS hands down. >> a, b = 2, 3 # say >> d = dict_of(a, b) >> d {"a": 2, "b": 3} >> # somewhere else... >> { a, b } = d >> a + b 5 The dict_of() function is already possible at runtime with python `ast` magic, see [1]. That package also has unpack_keys() again made possible with `ast`, but we'd of course want proper language support. [1] https://github.com/alexmojaki/sorcery
In Dict Unpacking in Python

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.