HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
alokmenghrajani
sliding_puzzle
JavaScript2022–2022
alokmenghrajani / sliding_puzzle

sliding_puzzle

A sliding puzzle with a Rubik's cube-like feel.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
13GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A sliding puzzle with a Rubik's cube-like feel.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 3-hour interval2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-06-02 17:16:39 UTC to 2022-06-05 18:09:59 UTC.

012022-06-02 15:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-02 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 2, 15:002022-06-02 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-02 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-02 21:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-03 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-03 03:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-03 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-03 06:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-03 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-03 09:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-03 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-03 12:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-03 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-03 15:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-03 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-03 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-03 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-03 21:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-04 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-04 03:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-04 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJun 4, 03:002022-06-04 06:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-04 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-04 09:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-04 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-04 12:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-04 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-04 15:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-04 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-04 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-04 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-04 21:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-05 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-05 03:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-05 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-05 06:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-05 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-05 09:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-05 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-05 12:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-05 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-05 15:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-05 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-05 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-05 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 5, 18:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jun 2, 15:002022-06-02 15:00:00 UTC2022-06-02 18:00:00 UTC101
Jun 2, 18:002022-06-02 18:00:00 UTC2022-06-02 21:00:00 UTC000
Jun 2, 21:002022-06-02 21:00:00 UTC2022-06-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 3, 00:002022-06-03 00:00:00 UTC2022-06-03 03:00:00 UTC000
Jun 3, 03:002022-06-03 03:00:00 UTC2022-06-03 06:00:00 UTC000
Jun 3, 06:002022-06-03 06:00:00 UTC2022-06-03 09:00:00 UTC000
Jun 3, 09:002022-06-03 09:00:00 UTC2022-06-03 12:00:00 UTC000
Jun 3, 12:002022-06-03 12:00:00 UTC2022-06-03 15:00:00 UTC000
Jun 3, 15:002022-06-03 15:00:00 UTC2022-06-03 18:00:00 UTC000
Jun 3, 18:002022-06-03 18:00:00 UTC2022-06-03 21:00:00 UTC000
Jun 3, 21:002022-06-03 21:00:00 UTC2022-06-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 00:002022-06-04 00:00:00 UTC2022-06-04 03:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 03:002022-06-04 03:00:00 UTC2022-06-04 06:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 06:002022-06-04 06:00:00 UTC2022-06-04 09:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 09:002022-06-04 09:00:00 UTC2022-06-04 12:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 12:002022-06-04 12:00:00 UTC2022-06-04 15:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 15:002022-06-04 15:00:00 UTC2022-06-04 18:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 18:002022-06-04 18:00:00 UTC2022-06-04 21:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 21:002022-06-04 21:00:00 UTC2022-06-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 00:002022-06-05 00:00:00 UTC2022-06-05 03:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 03:002022-06-05 03:00:00 UTC2022-06-05 06:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 06:002022-06-05 06:00:00 UTC2022-06-05 09:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 09:002022-06-05 09:00:00 UTC2022-06-05 12:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 12:002022-06-05 12:00:00 UTC2022-06-05 15:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 15:002022-06-05 15:00:00 UTC2022-06-05 18:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 18:002022-06-05 18:00:00 UTC2022-06-05 21:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Anyway, if you happened to peek at the illustration of the POC (used contrasting light / dark colours, plus patterns and softened letters of corresponding "inversion" [0]), do you think it is an improvement? Author of the game also updated the contrast [1], so now it is light blue versus slightly darker violet, but still with same default (usually black) text colour [1]. Do you like it better? Or would you prefer classical black versus white or something in this lines? [0] https://userstyles.world/api/style/preview/4975.webp [1] https://github.com/alokmenghrajani/sliding_puzzle/commit/20c... [2] https://github.com/alokmenghrajani/sliding_puzzle/raw/main/s...
In Show HN: I made a deceptively simple but hard sliding puzzle

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.