govuk-rfcs

They have 1.5k public repositories here at least: https://github.com/orgs/alphagov/repositories?type=all Collection of RFCs: https://github.com/alphagov/govuk-rfcs Open design system: https://design-system.service.gov.uk

This team is really something when it comes to transparency. For a government entity, an unreasonably large amount of their work is on GitHub. Examples: Front end design system: https://github.com/alphagov/govuk-frontend Project board: https://github.com/orgs/alphagov/projects/4 Requests for comment: https://github.com/alphagov/govuk-rfcs Gov.uk infrastructure as code (WIP): https://github.com/alphagov/govuk-infrastructure “The GDS way”: How they work, tech stack, processes, etc https://github.com/alphagov/gds-way “Terraform modules for on-boarding with Cyber Security services eg define the IAM SecurityAudit role”: https://github.com/alphagov/cyber-security-shared-terraform-... Full GitHub org with >1,500 repos: https://github.com/alphagov

From the related discussion: I think it's important for us to move on in this discussion, so I'm going to reject this RFC. This RFC proposes to use the govuk data tool to aid people in getting local development repo. However, the generation task of govuk data uses govuk-guix, which is a personal project built by Chris. We, as tech leadership of GOV.UK, have decided not to add guix to the GOV.UK stack. There's a lot of value in the example of the guix data tool and this discussion. We'll make sure that it informs the discussions we're having right now about work on the GOV.UK developer environment for next quarters. https://github.com/alphagov/govuk-rfcs/pull/101#issuecomment... So, it seems to be once person's project and the gov.uk leadership seem to have rejected Guix. Still a shame though, Guix and Nix are great for reproducibility and