HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
Amanieu
hashbrown
Rust2018–2019
Amanieu / hashbrown

hashbrown

Rust port of Google's SwissTable hash map

4Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
61GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Rust port of Google's SwissTable hash map

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-10-30 18:09:55 UTC to 2019-03-31 07:14:48 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

0122018-10-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-11-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsOct 292018-11-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-11-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-11-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-11-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-11-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-11-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-11-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-12-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-12-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-12-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-12-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-12-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-12-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-12-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2018-12-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-12-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-12-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJan 72019-01-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-02-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-02-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-02-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-02-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-02-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-02-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-02-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-02-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-03-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-03-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-03-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-03-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-03-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-03-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-03-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-03-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsMar 25

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Oct 292018-10-29 00:00:00 UTC2018-11-05 00:00:00 UTC110
Nov 52018-11-05 00:00:00 UTC2018-11-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 122018-11-12 00:00:00 UTC2018-11-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 192018-11-19 00:00:00 UTC2018-11-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 262018-11-26 00:00:00 UTC2018-12-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 32018-12-03 00:00:00 UTC2018-12-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 102018-12-10 00:00:00 UTC2018-12-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 172018-12-17 00:00:00 UTC2018-12-24 00:00:00 UTC110
Dec 242018-12-24 00:00:00 UTC2018-12-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 312018-12-31 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 72019-01-07 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 142019-01-14 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 212019-01-21 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 282019-01-28 00:00:00 UTC2019-02-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 42019-02-04 00:00:00 UTC2019-02-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 112019-02-11 00:00:00 UTC2019-02-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 182019-02-18 00:00:00 UTC2019-02-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 252019-02-25 00:00:00 UTC2019-03-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 42019-03-04 00:00:00 UTC2019-03-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 112019-03-11 00:00:00 UTC2019-03-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 182019-03-18 00:00:00 UTC2019-03-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 252019-03-25 00:00:00 UTC2019-04-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

4 sources
It's still pretty major, because SIMD, but not as dramatic https://github.com/Amanieu/hashbrown#performance Note that the hashbrown crate uses FxHash by default, so the second table is the fair comparison. When ported to the stdlib it will likely be changed to have SipHash as the default. For the standard hashmap, replacing SipHash with FxHash gets you a 4x perf boost. Replacing the standard hashmap with hashbrown gets you a 2x perf boost (when you're using FxHash, there are no numbers here for when you're using SipHash but I suspect it will still be significant, if smaller)
In RaptorQ and performance optimization in Rust

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.