HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
ampproject
meta
OPEN SOURCE2019–2019
ampproject / meta

meta

Information about the AMP open source project.

2Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
91GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Information about the AMP open source project.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2019-01-30 11:01:22 UTC to 2019-08-18 18:15:46 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

0122019-01-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-02-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJan 282019-02-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-02-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-02-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-02-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-02-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-02-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-02-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-03-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-03-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-03-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-03-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-03-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-03-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-03-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-03-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-04-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-04-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-04-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-04-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-04-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-04-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-04-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-04-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-05-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-05-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-05-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMay 62019-05-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-05-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-05-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-05-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-05-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-06-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-06-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-07-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-07-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-07-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-07-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-07-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-07-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-07-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-07-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-08-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-08-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-08-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-08-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-08-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsAug 12

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jan 282019-01-28 00:00:00 UTC2019-02-04 00:00:00 UTC101
Feb 42019-02-04 00:00:00 UTC2019-02-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 112019-02-11 00:00:00 UTC2019-02-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 182019-02-18 00:00:00 UTC2019-02-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 252019-02-25 00:00:00 UTC2019-03-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 42019-03-04 00:00:00 UTC2019-03-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 112019-03-11 00:00:00 UTC2019-03-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 182019-03-18 00:00:00 UTC2019-03-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 252019-03-25 00:00:00 UTC2019-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 12019-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-04-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 82019-04-08 00:00:00 UTC2019-04-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 152019-04-15 00:00:00 UTC2019-04-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 222019-04-22 00:00:00 UTC2019-04-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 292019-04-29 00:00:00 UTC2019-05-06 00:00:00 UTC000
May 62019-05-06 00:00:00 UTC2019-05-13 00:00:00 UTC000
May 132019-05-13 00:00:00 UTC2019-05-20 00:00:00 UTC000
May 202019-05-20 00:00:00 UTC2019-05-27 00:00:00 UTC000
May 272019-05-27 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 32019-06-03 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 102019-06-10 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 172019-06-17 00:00:00 UTC2019-06-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 242019-06-24 00:00:00 UTC2019-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 12019-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-07-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 82019-07-08 00:00:00 UTC2019-07-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 152019-07-15 00:00:00 UTC2019-07-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 222019-07-22 00:00:00 UTC2019-07-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 292019-07-29 00:00:00 UTC2019-08-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 52019-08-05 00:00:00 UTC2019-08-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 122019-08-12 00:00:00 UTC2019-08-19 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

3 sources
> Your examples predate <Advisory Committee> Advisory Committee has no say in anything that AMP does. Everything is designed and specced inside Google (or Google-dominated work groups) and then vetted by the Technical Steering Committee. Advisory Committee's findings and advise is non-binding: https://github.com/ampproject/meta/pull/37 And all the WG's are assigned projects that have already been accepted into AMP (such as AMP 4 Email). And yes, my example is important because it was a huge change that no one asked for, but now it's in AMP. As are all the other changes that already hurt the web. > Why are they forced to use it? I would really like to see your position stated coherently. Google has near monopoly on search. In order to compete with it you need to provide nearly all of the same features. > How do you propose to achieve insta
Read the rest
nt loading web pages, while working around all of iOS's bugs? There are no bugs in iOS that preclude instant pages. And the bugs that AMP introduced are, well, the bugs that AMP introduced. AMP broke the behaviour on purpose and refused to implement any suggested fixes. > This just demonstrates that you don't understand AMP, don't understand RSS, or don't understand both. AMP allows the link aggregator to cache and directly serve the article contents, exactly like RSS does. I perfectly understand what AMP and RSS are. You don't understand what either one is. RSS was never about caching or link aggregators. RSS is a web feed. That has a standard XML format and can be read by anyone: a client app on your phone, a client app on your desktop, a link aggregator that can be built by a half-decent engineer in about two evenings. Additionally, it is trivially discoverable by including a standard meta tag on a page. Also, RSS always leads to the original URL. AMP is not a feed. It's a collection of specially constructed HTML pages (which are not valid HTML5, by the way). They are not "instant". They are underperformant by Google's own standards (try running Google's own Lighthouse tools report against one from cold cache). They are only "instant" when significant effort has been spent setting up an AMP cache so that some or all content is already on the client's browser before the client hits the AMP page. They are not discoverable. A meta tag linking to an AMP version will only link one URL, that's it. There is no feed. An AMP cache destroyes the very essence of the web: linking. You will not get the original URL, you will get the cache's URL. Implementing an AMP cache is a significant endeavour, and only a handful exists (as far as I know, there are no opensource AMP caches).
In Faster AMP on the Origin: AMP and SSR
> AMP Project is run similar to nodejs by adopting an open-governance model I won't believe this until I see the tech lead and the committee go from being totally opaque to actually answering direct questions. So far "after months of research" they can't even provide a description of how working groups are selected, which are the criteria, what exactly they govern and many other things described, e.g. here: https://github.com/ampproject/meta/pull/1#pullrequestreview-... Or, e.g. they are going to have an AMP4Email working group. For a feature that no one asked for, no one wants, no one was discussed with. How did it get there? Oh "Gmail team said they are going to do it". But yeah, the "Approvers" working group will surely have something to say about this. Riiiight.
In Google Takes Its First Steps Toward Killing the URL

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.