HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
anantdgoel
ProjectFib
Python2016–2016
anantdgoel / ProjectFib

ProjectFib

Chrome extension to flag fake news on Facebook. Built at HackPrinceton '16

4Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
746GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Chrome extension to flag fake news on Facebook. Built at HackPrinceton '16

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-11-18 23:28:10 UTC to 2016-11-19 06:42:31 UTC.

012016-11-18 23:00:00 UTC to 2016-11-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsNov 18, 23:002016-11-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-11-19 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016-11-19 01:00:00 UTC to 2016-11-19 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-11-19 02:00:00 UTC to 2016-11-19 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsNov 19, 02:002016-11-19 03:00:00 UTC to 2016-11-19 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-11-19 04:00:00 UTC to 2016-11-19 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-11-19 05:00:00 UTC to 2016-11-19 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-11-19 06:00:00 UTC to 2016-11-19 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsNov 19, 06:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Nov 18, 23:002016-11-18 23:00:00 UTC2016-11-19 00:00:00 UTC101
Nov 19, 00:002016-11-19 00:00:00 UTC2016-11-19 01:00:00 UTC101
Nov 19, 01:002016-11-19 01:00:00 UTC2016-11-19 02:00:00 UTC000
Nov 19, 02:002016-11-19 02:00:00 UTC2016-11-19 03:00:00 UTC101
Nov 19, 03:002016-11-19 03:00:00 UTC2016-11-19 04:00:00 UTC000
Nov 19, 04:002016-11-19 04:00:00 UTC2016-11-19 05:00:00 UTC000
Nov 19, 05:002016-11-19 05:00:00 UTC2016-11-19 06:00:00 UTC000
Nov 19, 06:002016-11-19 06:00:00 UTC2016-11-19 07:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
Looking at the code, it does less than is claimed. The add-on scrapes a Facebook page and calls their server. All the real work is in [1]. There seem to be just two tests, both applied to images - 1) is it an "adult" image, and 2) if it has text, does the text match the indicated Twitter feed? It uses some Microsoft Project Oxford APIs to do all the image work. There's an "adult image" test API, and an OCR API. [1] https://github.com/anantdgoel/HackPrincetonF16/blob/master/b...
In FiB – A Facebook newsfeed accuracy verification Chrome extension
No. Google is fooled by fake news too. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/googles-top-search-result-for-fi... I have some problem with those claims that offer little to none details. Use the above link as an example, how do we teach machine to verify this news? First, we need to teach them to formulate a question, in this case, 'Who has a larger number of popular vote [as of now]?', then it needs to find its way to verify the number from reliable sources, possibly need to struggle between conflicted sources as well. This is no trivial, if we solve this, we might as well solve the problem of understanding human language as a whole. The mentioning of Princeton students' Hackthon project is really offbeat, if the author really bothers to look into what that project actually is, nothing more than an API mashup. https://github.com/anantdgoel/HackPrin
Read the rest
cetonF16/blob/master/b... Disclaimer: I worked for a major news app, and the effort to battle fake news or low quality non-trustworthy news is ever growing. While application of machine learning is promising, human, especially experienced human is still the real workhorse for this problem Edit: Typo.
In Facebook Must Really Suck At Machine Learning
Coincidentally I just read an article about the idea being implemented during a Hackathon at Princeton very recently [0]. Four students put together a very intelligent AI in 36 (!!) hours to verify articles posted on FB for truth, using the term AI lightly of course. They've also open sourced their project since then [1]. Obligatory chrome extension link [2]. [0] - http://www.sfgate.com/technology/businessinsider/article/It-... [1] - https://github.com/anantdgoel/HackPrincetonF16 [2] - https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/fib/ofpheinlpjdffp...
In Ask HN: Chrome extension to verify credibility of articles

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.