HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
andrewrk
andrewkelley.me
HTML2026–2026
andrewrk / andrewkelley.me

andrewkelley.me

my personal site

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
25GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

my personal site

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 3-hour interval3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2026-07-13 12:37:46 UTC to 2026-07-15 01:25:23 UTC.

012026-07-13 12:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-13 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 13, 12:002026-07-13 15:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-13 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-07-13 18:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-13 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-13 21:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-14 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-14 03:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-14 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-14 06:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-14 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJul 14, 06:002026-07-14 09:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-14 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-14 12:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-14 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-14 15:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-14 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-14 18:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-14 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-14 21:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-15 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 15, 00:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jul 13, 12:002026-07-13 12:00:00 UTC2026-07-13 15:00:00 UTC101
Jul 13, 15:002026-07-13 15:00:00 UTC2026-07-13 18:00:00 UTC101
Jul 13, 18:002026-07-13 18:00:00 UTC2026-07-13 21:00:00 UTC000
Jul 13, 21:002026-07-13 21:00:00 UTC2026-07-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 14, 00:002026-07-14 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-14 03:00:00 UTC000
Jul 14, 03:002026-07-14 03:00:00 UTC2026-07-14 06:00:00 UTC000
Jul 14, 06:002026-07-14 06:00:00 UTC2026-07-14 09:00:00 UTC000
Jul 14, 09:002026-07-14 09:00:00 UTC2026-07-14 12:00:00 UTC000
Jul 14, 12:002026-07-14 12:00:00 UTC2026-07-14 15:00:00 UTC000
Jul 14, 15:002026-07-14 15:00:00 UTC2026-07-14 18:00:00 UTC000
Jul 14, 18:002026-07-14 18:00:00 UTC2026-07-14 21:00:00 UTC000
Jul 14, 21:002026-07-14 21:00:00 UTC2026-07-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 15, 00:002026-07-15 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-15 03:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
Now you've misquoted me. Actual quote[1] is: "This appears to be an outright fabrication." To quote yourself[2], "The honest thing to do is acknowledge that you were mistaken and apologize for the false accusation." Are you going to do that for me now? I don't expect you to, because I don't think you are being dishonest. I think you are earnestly trying to untangle the facts from two parties for whom you have no bias one way or the other, which is commendable. Like you, I am an individual attempting to paint an accurate picture of reality for my readers. Anthropic, on the other hand, is not an individual nor trying to be accurate. They are doing exactly as they are supposed to: maximizing value for shareholders. To do this, they need to make this rewrite appear successful, so they need to retcon this idea that they were doing good enginee
Read the rest
ring practices in their zig codebase the whole time, including fuzzing, even though that is not the case. [1]: https://github.com/andrewrk/andrewkelley.me/blob/c39f868e578... [2]: https://mastodon.social/@michael@m.mtlynch.io/11689618811296...
In Zig Creator Calls Spade a Spade, Anthropic Blows Smoke

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.