HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
andywer
webpack-blocks
JavaScript2016–2016
andywer / webpack-blocks

webpack-blocks

📦 Configure webpack using functional feature blocks.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
3KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

📦 Configure webpack using functional feature blocks.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-12-07 01:31:15 UTC to 2016-12-07 21:48:33 UTC.

012016-12-07 01:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsDec 7, 01:002016-12-07 02:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 03:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 04:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 05:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 06:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 07:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 08:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 09:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 10:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 11:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsDec 7, 11:002016-12-07 12:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 13:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 14:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 15:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 16:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 17:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 18:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 19:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 20:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-07 21:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-07 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsDec 7, 21:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Dec 7, 01:002016-12-07 01:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 02:00:00 UTC110
Dec 7, 02:002016-12-07 02:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 03:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 03:002016-12-07 03:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 04:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 04:002016-12-07 04:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 05:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 05:002016-12-07 05:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 06:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 06:002016-12-07 06:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 07:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 07:002016-12-07 07:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 08:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 08:002016-12-07 08:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 09:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 09:002016-12-07 09:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 10:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 10:002016-12-07 10:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 11:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 11:002016-12-07 11:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 12:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 12:002016-12-07 12:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 13:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 13:002016-12-07 13:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 14:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 14:002016-12-07 14:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 15:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 15:002016-12-07 15:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 16:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 16:002016-12-07 16:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 17:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 17:002016-12-07 17:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 18:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 18:002016-12-07 18:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 19:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 19:002016-12-07 19:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 20:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 20:002016-12-07 20:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 21:00:00 UTC000
Dec 7, 21:002016-12-07 21:00:00 UTC2016-12-07 22:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
I'll go ahead and quote the most relevant slides from my presentation: > Javascript/Client Challenges: > - No built-in module definition system > - No encapsulation > - Prototypal-based inheritance system unlike most languages > - No static type declarations or compilation > - Dynamically modified objects and data > - Minimal standard library > - Variations in browser capabilities > - Document layout model repurposed for application layouts > Javascript/Client Dev Goals > - Minimize bytes sent over the wire > - Handle browser compatibility issues > - Fill in gaps in JS standard library and language spec > - Reuse and share code between apps > - Build increasingly complex full-blown applications that just happen to live inside a browser So, it's all those aspects together. People want to use the latest syntax, patch holes in the language,
Read the rest
standardize behavior, share code, and run full-blown compilation pipelines that parse, transform, link, and optimize, and use all that to build complex applications. That's a completely different world than just using jQuery to toggle some divs. In addition, these pieces have really only come together in the last 6 years or so. The C ecosystem has been around since the late 70s, Java is over 20 years old, and so on. Those ecosystems have had time to build out tools and conventions, and the underlying platforms have been more stable as well. In the front-end world, browsers and runtime capabilities are constantly changing, and as people are pushing the limits of the language and ecosystem, others are inspired by those ideas. So, there's a lot of catch-up and iteration going on. I'm not going to say that it's easy to keep up with or that everything about these changes is perfect and wonderful. That said, I _do_ think that the rate of change is slowing down somewhat, and that the situation is stabilizing. I think the last year and a half of "Javascript Fatigue" complaints have also raised awareness of the churn, and that there's a big emphasis on improving developer experience going on right now. For example, the Webpack team has made a huge effort to rewrite their docs from scratch ([0]), and there's several utilities out there that try to make it easier to write Webpack configs without having to fiddle with every last option yourself ([1], [2]). There's also tools like Create-React-App ([3}), which try to encapsulate the entire build tool process for you ([4]). So, yeah - everyone's still trying to sort things out a bit, but ultimately the tools and technologies now available are letting people do a lot of things they couldn't do before. [0] https://webpack.js.org/ [1] https://github.com/andywer/webpack-blocks [2] https://github.com/webpack-flow/webpack-flow [3] https://github.com/facebookincubator/create-react-app [4] https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/5gt2c4/you_dont_ne...
In The State of Babel

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.