HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
arasatasaygin
openlogos
OPEN SOURCE2018–2018
arasatasaygin / openlogos

openlogos

Free logos for open source projects

4Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
2.6KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Free logos for open source projects

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-06-19 08:48:22 UTC to 2018-06-20 05:23:21 UTC.

012018-06-19 08:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-19 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 19, 08:002018-06-19 09:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-19 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-19 10:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-19 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-19 11:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-19 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-19 12:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-19 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-19 13:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-19 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-19 14:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-19 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018-06-19 15:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-19 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-19 16:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-19 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-19 17:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-19 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018-06-19 18:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-19 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJun 19, 18:002018-06-19 19:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-19 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-19 20:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-19 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-19 21:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-19 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-19 22:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-19 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-19 23:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-20 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-20 01:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-20 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-20 02:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-20 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-20 03:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-20 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-20 04:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-20 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-20 05:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-20 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJun 20, 05:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jun 19, 08:002018-06-19 08:00:00 UTC2018-06-19 09:00:00 UTC101
Jun 19, 09:002018-06-19 09:00:00 UTC2018-06-19 10:00:00 UTC000
Jun 19, 10:002018-06-19 10:00:00 UTC2018-06-19 11:00:00 UTC000
Jun 19, 11:002018-06-19 11:00:00 UTC2018-06-19 12:00:00 UTC000
Jun 19, 12:002018-06-19 12:00:00 UTC2018-06-19 13:00:00 UTC000
Jun 19, 13:002018-06-19 13:00:00 UTC2018-06-19 14:00:00 UTC000
Jun 19, 14:002018-06-19 14:00:00 UTC2018-06-19 15:00:00 UTC101
Jun 19, 15:002018-06-19 15:00:00 UTC2018-06-19 16:00:00 UTC000
Jun 19, 16:002018-06-19 16:00:00 UTC2018-06-19 17:00:00 UTC000
Jun 19, 17:002018-06-19 17:00:00 UTC2018-06-19 18:00:00 UTC101
Jun 19, 18:002018-06-19 18:00:00 UTC2018-06-19 19:00:00 UTC000
Jun 19, 19:002018-06-19 19:00:00 UTC2018-06-19 20:00:00 UTC000
Jun 19, 20:002018-06-19 20:00:00 UTC2018-06-19 21:00:00 UTC000
Jun 19, 21:002018-06-19 21:00:00 UTC2018-06-19 22:00:00 UTC000
Jun 19, 22:002018-06-19 22:00:00 UTC2018-06-19 23:00:00 UTC000
Jun 19, 23:002018-06-19 23:00:00 UTC2018-06-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20, 00:002018-06-20 00:00:00 UTC2018-06-20 01:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20, 01:002018-06-20 01:00:00 UTC2018-06-20 02:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20, 02:002018-06-20 02:00:00 UTC2018-06-20 03:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20, 03:002018-06-20 03:00:00 UTC2018-06-20 04:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20, 04:002018-06-20 04:00:00 UTC2018-06-20 05:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20, 05:002018-06-20 05:00:00 UTC2018-06-20 06:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

4 sources
Interesting, although a bit strange to me ... is the author expecting existing projects to want to claim a logo and rename themselves, or are the names of the logos only placeholders? Anyway, I think the "globe"[1] one is quite close to looking like AT&T's[2] which would at least make me a bit wary. [1] https://github.com/arasatasaygin/openlogos/issues/24 [2] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AT%26T_logo_2016.svg
In Show HN: Open Logos – Free logos for open source projects

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.