FEfelixhummel·Oct 7, 2025
Reminds me of https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org
In Ask HN: What are you working on? (September 2025)arguman
arguman.org
Python2015–2025
arguman / arguman.org
arguman.org
Argument mapping and analysis platform
8Distinct people
11Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.4KGitHub stars
What to know before exploring
What it is
Argument mapping and analysis platform
GitHub
Where it is used
No documented product use has been verified yet.
What people are saying
No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.
No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.
Also in these discussions
No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.
This week on Hacker News
Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.
No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.
Mentions over time
HN mentions by year11 dated mentions
Observed mentions: 2015-10-13 11:44:22 UTC to 2025-10-07 11:05:22 UTC.
Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.
View mention counts and date ranges
| Period | Start (UTC) | End (exclusive, UTC) | Mentions | Submissions | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2 | 0 | 2 |
What Hacker News says
11 sourcesMakes me think of arguman[1] and kialo[2]. I discovered arguman maybe 10 years ago and have been thinking about it ever since. It's non-functional now but the source code is available. Maybe it's just my wishful thinking, but if we could map out every detail of an argument, maybe we could make progress faster, as a species. If this were incentivized well (like for instance polymarket), maybe with crypto rewards or something, this *could* take off.
[1] https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org - the website exists but is non-functional now
[2] https://www.kialo.com - feels like a dumbed-down version of arguman
In Show HN: FlakeUIMight there be a platform like Amazon turk for curating knowledge where the "turk" gets incentivized through its value generated instead of fixed rate? How much the average Wikipedian receive using such funding model and could its incentives align with ideals of utility and rigour? One possible result from incentivizing consilience [0] : a xanadu-style [1] network of curated human knowledge more functional/constructive than arguman [2]. Just a thought.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consilience
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26216036
[2] https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org
In GPT Might Be an Information Virus> Like many environmental initiatives I worry that we’re more concerned about making ourselves feel better than actually solving the problem.
Either way, instead of reifying the relevant facts and statistics and iterating on them (or upturning them when invalidated), we tend to debate them repeatedly, even over decades as manufacturing methods and trends in society change.
(this is me pining for a system like arguman[1] with the critical mass of wikipedia to help forge these debates into more reliable, long-term results)
[1] - https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org
In The recycling myth: A plastic waste solution littered with failureLet's hope that a well-constructed, well-behaved and well-participated argument forum maintained over long enough timescales can lead towards better outcomes for everyone. Best of luck with the project.
You might be aware of it already, but just in case, the most progress I've seen in the area of web-based argument mapping has been Arguman ( https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org ). They're also following an open source model and there could be opportunities to co-operate and/or share ideas.
In Request for Technically Risky ProjectsAh, I had forgotten that https://en.arguman.org/ even existed, until reading this.
This dates back to 2014 where Turkey was still struggling with the aftermath of widespread civil unrest. The entire nation found itself highly polarized while debates were fueled with mutual anger and disbelief.
This is an "argument analysis platform", as they call it, and it is open source, too, maintained at https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org .
The basic premise is the construction of an argument map, "arguably" a common utility to practice critical thinking.
More info on that at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_map .
In Missing Structure in Technical DiscussionsI'm sure they would appreciate an issue https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org/issues
In React is mostly hypeLooks like it's up here: https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org
No idea how to install it, but take a look :)
In Show HN: Arguman – Argument Analysis PlatformAlso arguman's source code is available on github:
http://github.com/arguman/arguman.org
In Show HN: Arguman – Argument Analysis PlatformThe source code is available on github:
http://github.com/arguman/arguman.org
In Critical Thinking MappingAlso source codes available on github:
http://github.com/arguman/arguman.org
In An argument analysis platform