engrafo

This would never happen but in an ideal world, we should be able to click on a citation to jump to the part of the paper that is being referenced and each paper page should have a discussion board so we can easily communicate with the authors and group the discussion in one place instead of us having to google to see if there is relevant discussion on twitter/reddit. We can even put links to talks, tutorials, blogs, github repo, demo, paperswithcode/google scholar/open review, background material, a timeline of citations in tree form on the same page(actually I am seeing more machine learning papers that have a project page that does some of these) or even turn it into a mini wiki. I just think html has so much more potential(especially now with LLM we can do semantic search). I wonder if there would be interest in such a chrom extension

Converting LaTeX to HTML may be a route to making it accessible. I'm working on this project: https://github.com/arxiv-vanity/engrafo It's 80% of the way there, but with 80% more work it could be a pretty complete implementation. It powers this: https://www.arxiv-vanity.com/

The important/difficult problem of generating beautiful web pages is most of the way there already: https://github.com/arxiv-vanity/engrafo There are some features in LaTeXML, which powers Engrafo, for adding some "LaTeX++" features, like embedding JS, etc. Still could do with a lot of work, though.

You might like this LaTeX to HTML converter I'm working on: https://github.com/arxiv-vanity/engrafo What primitives do you think need adding to TeX? LaTeXML, which powers Engrafo, does a pretty good job of converting plain TeX, as well as LaTeX.

Bitmapped images should be full size. Extracting proper vector graphics is a work in progress: https://github.com/arxiv-vanity/engrafo/issues/247 If you want to extract figures/images from PDFs, the best way to do it is to use Adobe Illustrator (or equivalent... Inkscape maybe?). That’ll let you extract full sized bitmapped graphics or arbitrary parts of the PDF as SVG vector images.

We tried using KaTeX for https://www.arxiv-vanity.com but unfortunately it doesn’t support a lot of commonly used stuff. I forget what most of that was now... over/underbrace is one I recall. In the end we used MathJax pre-rendered on the server, which is the same speed as pre-rendered KaTeX: https://github.com/mathjax/MathJax-node We’ve also done lots of tweaking to make it support as much stuff on the arXiv as possible. Our MathJax config is a fun read: https://github.com/arxiv-vanity/engrafo/blob/master/src/conv...

If you’re interested in an actual TeX distribution for the web, I’m working on something like that: https://github.com/arxiv-vanity/engrafo It’s based on LaTeXML, which does the heavy lifting of converting LaTeX to HTML. I’m more interested in the CSS applied on top of that. I want to make web output of the same calibre as the PDF output. (Or, near to it at least. :)

The main workhorse is https://dlmf.nist.gov/LaTeXML/ as you can find once you reach https://github.com/arxiv-vanity/engrafo. LaTeXML converts tex to XML by running latex ("only latex can parse latex") and working on the DVI output. But nevertheless this is a hard job so I will loook into the engrafo code soon because I want to apply this to a book we have written.

So much this. This is one of the main reasons I wanted to build this. https://github.com/arxiv-vanity/engrafo/issues/127

LaTeX is hard, but we'll keep at it! That issue is being tracked here: https://github.com/arxiv-vanity/engrafo/issues/12

Because we didn't know that existed! That looks so much better, thank you. The pandocfilters library is really hard to use. https://github.com/arxiv-vanity/engrafo/issues/160

A lot of things. LaTeX and its packages have so much surface area. Our approach so far is to just make the papers that we read readable. That probably covers the 20% of LaTeX features that 80% of people use. Here is the broken stuff we are keeping track of: https://github.com/arxiv-vanity/engrafo/issues (feel free to add to it!)

Ah, looks like we don't support theorems. You can track it here: https://github.com/arxiv-vanity/engrafo/issues/157 Thanks!

We were frustrated by the experience of reading machine learning papers on screens (particularly phones/tablets). There are lots of good tools for authoring HTML papers (Distill, Authorea, etc) but nothing that deals with the vast number of PDF papers that already exist. So, we built Arxiv Vanity: a site that renders Arxiv papers as web pages. It’s still pretty janky, but for the papers that do render correctly, the experience is so much better than reading a PDF. For example: https://www.arxiv-vanity.com/papers/1705.04085v3/ https://www.arxiv-vanity.com/papers/1708.00884/ https://www.arxiv-vanity.com/papers/1705.06031v2/ The source for the LaTeX to HTML renderer is on GitHub[0]. It’s built on Pandoc[1] and Distill.pub’s template[2]. [0] https://github.com/arxiv-vanity/engrafo [1] https://pandoc.org [2] https://github.com/distillpub/templ