HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
aspnet
Benchmarks
C#2015–2018
aspnet / Benchmarks

Benchmarks

Benchmarks for ASP.NET Core

10Distinct people
13Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.2KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Benchmarks for ASP.NET Core

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 7:56:55 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year13 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-09-03 17:17:20 UTC to 2018-08-20 19:40:40 UTC.

02468102015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 0 submissions, 10 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC10010
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

10 sources
I would learn ASP.NET Core. It's a significant design shift that has some growing pains for the community but will be a big improvement. I like Core because it's easier to build a minimal website (without all the bloat that comes with ASP.NET 4 and previous, like System.Web). Also your application specifies most of the behavior now, rather than relying on IIS configuration. Performance benchmarks have also been exciting: https://github.com/aspnet/benchmarks
In Microsoft .NET Core and ASP.NET Core Bug Bounty
They link to some benchmarks in the article: https://github.com/aspnet/benchmarks (they're a little hard to read on mobile, but I think the tl;dr is "plenty fast" (or to quote the article: "Our lab runs show that ASP.NET Core is faster than some of our industry peers. We see throughput that is 8x better than Node.js and almost 3x better than Go, on the same hardware. We’re also not done! These improvements are from the changes that we were able to get into the 1.0 product.")
In Announcing .NET Core 1.0
The performance improvements that Ben Adams and other ASP.NET Core contributors have made haven't been Windows specific for the most part. Personally, I do most of my perf testing on Windows, but that doesn't mean Linux is completely left out. Last month, I did some Linux profiling in our perf lab. As part of that, I ran the exact same benchmark shown in that graph on the exact same equipment and got over double the RPS numbers we got back in November much like we did on Windows. I just updated the https://github.com/aspnet/benchmarks/ repo with the linux numbers I got last month since Ben's blog post has brought some increased attention to it. We plan to do a more complete benchmark run soon so we can update more numbers.
In ASP.NET Core – 2300% More Requests Served per Second
Update: Checked with the team, latest Linux benchmark for plaintext with pipelining from January was 928,023 rps, which is a lot closer to the Windows numbers (78%). Updated here: https://github.com/aspnet/benchmarks/#plain-text-with-http-p... Linux benchmarks are included here: https://github.com/aspnet/benchmarks/ The team definitely wants to make ASP.NET Core run fast on Linux, too. The ASP.NET team perf rig runs both Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Windows Server 2012 R2. A lot of the perf enhancements are due to community pull requests, mostly from Ben (author of parent post). The perf work's been discussed a lot on the weekly community standup calls (http://live.asp.net), here's one going over the rig and perf in general: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7O81CAjmOXk&list=PL0M0zPgJ3H... There's a lot going on right now - both ASP.NET Core and .N
Read the rest
ET Core are new to Linux, the teams are working on getting 1.0 releases out the door, etc. I expect perf on both Windows and Linux to continue to improve, both before and after 1.0 release. This week on the community standup, Damian said that perf is one area that's lower risk as RTM approaches, and that they're hoping for more improvement there. And this is very much an open source project, as you can see from the merged pull requests in general (https://github.com/aspnet/KestrelHttpServer/pulls?q=is%3Apr+...) and the fact that Ben (non m-dollar) is battling with a Microsoft dev to be the top contributor. It'd be great to get some more devs with Linux HTTP serving background contributing. I think I remember that they only posted benchmark updates when there was a significant change. Checking with the team now. Source: long time ASP.NET groupie, Microsoft employee (until they find out I'm goofing off on HN instead of replying to e-mail).
In ASP.NET Core – 2300% More Requests Served per Second

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.