zod-to-openapi

ala Mintify or Docusaurus. Even interactive ones, like Swagger UI. The vast majority of API browsers & tooling understands OAPI, so why re-create (an often incomplete) version of the truth when using those tools? > Whatever is overall fastest and gets me on to the problems I'm really trying to solve. You may start (slightly) faster, but you'll incur significant cost when you move past the "trivial implementation" stage. For instance: - Do you do request & response validation on the server? That'll often need duplication on the client (e.g, error messages, and once out of sync, client-side validation mismatches server-side response) - Typescript on client & server? Then you're already doing the manual work (often more than once) that oAPI->types would get you for free. - Implementing client-side XHR calls manually, and getting typing right, is a pretty significant undertaking. Multiply that by the number of client-side stacks the API will be consumed by. Or, just generate them via OAPI (or real-time infer via something like ts-rest) - TS on client, but another BE stack? OpenAPI, when used right, ensures the "contract" is 1:1. When BE changes, client needs changing -- or it breaks. You want this safety. - Manually mocking API responses is wasteful; write good oAPI specs and auto-generate mocks (e.g, MSW). - Do you test the real API implementation? OpenAPI specs can help you do that automatically. At this stage of my career, I would turn down a job offer from a company/team that wasn't willing to use OpenAPI or equivalent single-source-of-truth (*unless I'm in a truly desperate situation)