sftp

exclusively I would disagree, although this is a matter of opinion I suppose. Having used both VM's and Docker for deployment, Docker is ridiculously more developer-friendly than a standard VM architecture. > No way to escape dependency hell I don't worry about dependencies anymore. If I want to try a new app, I `docker run` it. No dependencies. My apps themselves comes with all of their dependencies so I don't have to screw around with dependencies on a host provider. Sure, it doesn't completely solve dependency problems (you still need to write a Dockerfile) but it makes my life a whole lot easier compared to without Docker. Docker isn't the right fit for everything, and there's a lot of ways that I can think of where it can be improved. It strikes me like this was written by a frustrated sysadmin who hasn't spent the time to learn the tools (which is understandable, the learning curve is high and most things are different from traditional sysadmin tools). In fact, in alot of cases Docker is needlessly complex and overkill. However, spreading FUD doesn't do anything to address these concerns and might scare away a lot of developers who could benefit from Docker.