TOTouche·Mar 19, 2020
What am I missing? Seems fine to me: https://github.com/aurelia/framework
In GitHub shuts off access to Aurelia repository, citing trade sanctionsaurelia
framework
TypeScript2015–2020
aurelia / framework
framework
The Aurelia 1 framework entry point, bringing together all the required sub-modules of Aurelia.
7Distinct people
7Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
11.7KGitHub stars
What to know before exploring
What it is
The Aurelia 1 framework entry point, bringing together all the required sub-modules of Aurelia.
GitHub
Where it is used
No documented product use has been verified yet.
What people are saying
No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.
No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.
Also in these discussions
No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.
This week on Hacker News
Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 12:54:37 PM UTC.
No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.
Mentions over time
HN mentions by year7 dated mentions
Observed mentions: 2015-01-26 23:11:21 UTC to 2020-03-19 17:37:51 UTC.
Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.
View mention counts and date ranges
| Period | Start (UTC) | End (exclusive, UTC) | Mentions | Submissions | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2018 | 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2 | 0 | 2 |
What Hacker News says
7 sourcesIt looks like a JS frontend framework. I've never used it. I have no idea why it would be sanctioned. Bizarrely Aurelia 1.0 at https://github.com/aurelia/framework has a banner across its top indicating trade sanctions, but the new version Aurelia 2.0 doesn't https://github.com/aurelia/aurelia.
Aurelia's developers suspect it's because they have contributors from sanctioned countries. That's the first I've ever heard of such a thing. https://twitter.com/AureliaEffect/status/1240664151753551873
EDIT: And the banner is gone... Just when I was going to save some screenshots.
In GitHub shuts off access to Aurelia repository, citing trade sanctionsSorry, I still don't get it. Take the CustomerDetail example in the "Component Instantiation Through Dependency Injection" section:
@inject(HttpClient)
export class CustomerDetail {
constructor(http) {
this.http = http;
}
}
If this really creates a Web Component, how does `this.http` ever get set? The browser will call the constructor with no arguments.
What exactly gets passed to `document.registerElement()` (for the v0 Custom Elements API) or `customElements.define()` (for the v1 Custom Elements API)? Are you saying that Aurelia generates and registers a separate custom element class? That's not in the docs. If so, how does that element find the instances to inject into the user-defined constructors?
The main issue that talks about custom element support is still open, and the answer really does seem to
Read the rest
be that Aurelia can't create custom elements: https://github.com/aurelia/framework/issues/7
This unfortunately seems to confirm that Aurelia uses the terminology of Web Components, but doesn't actually use or create real Web Components.
What's your full build/bundle time like? May be faster to just bundle the parts you need and build them (and use the compiled output). Also ensure caching is enabled for the stuff you want to cache (deps, I assume).
Cachebusting is possible with systemjs. Looks like this project is a good start:
https://github.com/stealjs/cache-bust
Here's a quick-n-dirty fix for this same problem when working with Aurelia:
https://github.com/aurelia/framework/issues/94#issuecomment-...
Here's where SystemJS devs are discussing adding cachebusting:
https://github.com/systemjs/systemjs/issues/172
In What's New in Webpack 2These test the framework and look rather incomplete: https://github.com/aurelia/framework/tree/74176a5a6389b304d1... :)
It doesn't really cover testing the application, right? Or, is the implication that app writers should do the same thing?
In Introducing Aureliahttp://github.com/aurelia/framework under Running the Tests. Looks like it uses Karma for unit testing.
In Introducing Aurelia