avian

it's generally immature, and the XPBD solver that they use is, unbeknownst to the young author at the time of the crate's creation, patented by NVIDIA [2] :( Both of them are working to improve (and I'm very pleased to see that even independent of this discussion), but neither is ready for imminent official endorsement or integration. One day we'll have a Blessed Choice though. As for telling people "go forth and build your game!": things are stabilizing, and key functionality gaps are gradually getting filled. I have a terrible tendency to be overly honest, even in my marketing text, so there's going to be a long period of time where the actual answer is "it depends on what you're making". Today, if you're building a weird game-adjacent bit of software (think CAD) for desktop platforms: totally ready! There are several very happy companies doing that. If you wanna mess around with Rust and nurse the Next Great Solo Dev Science-Based MMORPG Voxel Game: you'll have a blast, and it won't affect your chance of shipping a whit. If you want to build a simulation-y desktop game with lots of procedural generation and complex logic: honestly probably a good fit. You'll hit bugs and limitations, but you will in every other engine you use so... If you want to ship high-performance web games, AAA graphics or mobile: eh, probably doable but dicey. If you want to ship to console: uh we'll find out if we can jump through all of the hoops and convince the right people to get Rust on console before the Steam Deck knockoffs devour the market (please!). These will all slowly change, but an answer for "is it ready" will be hard to pin me down on until it's a full-fledged competitor to Unity, Unreal and Godot. [0]: https://rapier.rs/docs/ [1]: https://github.com/Jondolf/bevy_xpbd [2]: https://github.com/Jondolf/bevy_xpbd/issues/346