HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
aws
aws-cdk
TypeScript2018–2025
aws / aws-cdk

aws-cdk

The AWS Cloud Development Kit is a framework for defining cloud infrastructure in code

31Distinct people
36Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
13KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

The AWS Cloud Development Kit is a framework for defining cloud infrastructure in code

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 12:45:45 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year36 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-07-31 18:13:56 UTC to 2025-12-02 19:39:22 UTC.

024682018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 2 submissions, 0 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 0 submissions, 8 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 2 submissions, 3 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 1 submissions, 7 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 2 submissions, 2 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC220
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC808
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC523
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC817
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC422

What Hacker News says

8 sources
Hi, I work on (part) of the CDK at the moment. If you've found bugs, we'd love to hear about them with an appropriate reproduction over on github[0]. Thus ends my corp-speak. The following is my opinion alone: The thing that is hard for a lot of people to understand, it feels like, is that the CDK is both a library (nee runtime) and CI system in one. The runtime produces, at the end of the day, a CloudFormation template that gets shoved into the right places. The CDK happens to make generating those easier. One of the core issues with working with CloudFormation is that it's limited in what the services support it doing. Services introduced before CloudFormation was really launched have the worst, but it wasn't until 2015 or so that most services really had "OK" support for CFN. CloudFormation is also brittle, and this causes a lot of hea
Read the rest
daches. CloudFormation can't handle serial operations that require "create & permute" sequences -- where two things have to be set up in order, then glued together later after some kind of configuration. The way the CDK does this is by deploying lambdas that get invoked after your stack is shipped out that make the relevant API calls. Terraform does this by having the code that Terraform runs make the API call. The difference here gets to be that the CDK can synthesize a change long before it is actually effected, allowing for things like second order permutations. Terraform does everything in-situ, standing up infrastructure and taking the place of both the CDK and CloudFormation. This has upsides and downsides on both, but a large upside (IMO, again) of the CDK approach is that you can code-wise validate certain things ahead of time before they're deployed, whereas with Terraform it's a little harder. Terraform's big upside is that it handles things that are Hard to do with CloudFormation alone by letting you figure out how to actually create/destroy that bit of infrastructure and hook up the relevant parts as one action in one codebase, rather than having to write Lambda handlers (the CDK calls these handlers "Custom Resource", which are different from Constructs) that get deployed and called when you need to setup/teardown/change the relevant parts. Both Terraform and the CDK are opaque wrappers around AWS as a whole, the difference being that Terraform wrote their own DSL to describe things that gets then attached to their own SDK (which appears to be JS?) with varying levels of integration, whereas the CDK allows you to use whatever language you're already using to build the primary structure of your application, but where you have fully atomic (not just rollback-able) changes via CloudFormation. [0]github.com/aws/aws-cdk/issues/new
In Does anyone else finds AWS and other Amazon services overly complicated?
I believe a real glimpse of the future you're describing can be seen with AWS CDK's L2 or higher constructs: https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk We already have the tools to have a cloud-scale application dynamically redefining and re-allocating its infrastructure. Give those tools some time to mature, and I'm sure the capabilities will be awesome. A good example is the common database backend. A lot of groups have some RDS instance provisioned someway to somehow serve some frontend. Over time, the number of users grow and the RDS needs more resources provisioned for it. My last 4 jobs, it was always someone's job to check the provisioning or respond to an alert and bump the provisioning up to whatever the next rung was. In the not too distant future, this type of task will be handled by a mildly intelligent CDK application.
In Ask HN: If Kubernetes is the solution, why are there so many DevOps jobs?

Ask HN: Anyone use GitHub Issues at their company?

I've used Jira (with integration to GitHub) at every company I've worked at. However, over the last couple of years, I noticed GitHub has been investing in their project management features. I've seen some open source projects leverage GitHub Issues (https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/issues and https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues), but it just looks really unorganized compared to Jira (possible bias because I'm new to GitHub Issues). Looking to get some thoughts on GitHub vs Jira for project management. We're a startup looking specifically at the following features: bug reporting, sprint/epic management, release management (from development, to code review, to QE verification, to release), and integration with non-engineering teams (ie, letting customer support/customer success tag issues that customers have brought up).
29 points · Open discussion
Parts of this have been linked to here over the past week or so, but I don't think the full picture was discussed yet. Even ignoring the conspiracy aspects, it's another set of packages where a change in the upstream has had an effect on a number of other projects. How to manage and handle this is an interesting topic that is largely unsolved... One example (linked in the Ars piece) is the AWS Cloud Developer Kit: https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/issues/18323 HN History: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateEnd=1641938400&dateRange=custom&...
In Developer sabotages his own apps, then claims Aaron Swartz was murdered
> What exactly does colors do? A picture is worth a thousand words → https://i.imgur.com/inxA7Pg.png The library inserts ANSI escape sequences [1] between the text you want to colorize in order to, well, colorize it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Many people are obsessed with colors in the Terminal, and so, they reach out to libraries like this. They exist in every major programming language ecosystem, even though colorizing text is as simple as writing this \x1b[48;5;011<TEXT>\x1[0m . One of the disadvantages of this rudimentary colorization technique is that if you have short-term memory, you will quickly forget the meaning of these numbers, but you can solve that problem with constants, there is no reason to install a third-party library with potentially malicious code to add this type of functionality to a high-profile project like AWS-CDK [2]. I wish the
Read the rest
se libraries would support NO_COLOR [3] more consistently. I have seen many “modern” CLI tools (the ones people like to build using Rust or Go) overuse colors with no option to disable them. [1] https://stackoverflow.com/a/33206814 [2] https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/pull/18324/files [3] https://no-color.org
In Dev corrupts NPM libs 'colors' and 'faker', breaking thousands of apps

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.