HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
axitkhurana
buster
Python2014–2018
axitkhurana / buster

buster

Brute force static site generator for Ghost

6Distinct people
6Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
789GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Brute force static site generator for Ghost

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year6 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-02-02 10:21:01 UTC to 2018-02-10 07:14:01 UTC.

01232014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 2 submissions, 1 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC321
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

6 sources
I use Jekyll for most of my blogs. For my company's, we needed multiple authors including non-technical people, so we couldn't use git for that. I recently discovered Ghost which I highly recommend: * https://ghost.org/ * Kickstarted in 2013 * Markdown-based * Open source, self-hostable * Hosted solution (https://ghost.org/pricing/) with support for your own domain name * Beautiful themes out of the box with custom css/js on an article, site-wide or theme level * Third party static site generation tools (https://github.com/axitkhurana/buster/, https://github.com/lexoyo/static-ghost) Example blog (default theme): https://blog.ghost.org/
In Ask HN: What is setup for your static blog generator?
That's the idea behind Buster for the Ghost blog framework (run Ghost locally or on a highly restricted web server then generate a static site from it you upload somewhere else) but it doesn't look maintained unfortunately: https://github.com/axitkhurana/buster I'd be very interested to know about more solutions like the above as it doesn't seem well explored. I've had some success running WordPress on Heroku (uploads go to AWS S3 and the database is hosted on AWS RDS) which I much prefer to the way typical VPSs are administrated. The Heroku filesystem doesn't allow the WordPress PHP files to be altered, you can't SSH in to the live server and you can recreate and rollback the whole server state in seconds if there are any problems. Either way, the more static the better in terms of minimising the attack surface and admin time in my opini
Read the rest
on.
In The Joy of Getting Hacked

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.