HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
balanced
balanced-api
Ruby2012–2014
balanced / balanced-api

balanced-api

Balanced API specification.

15Distinct people
50Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
220GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Balanced API specification.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 7:02:50 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month50 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2012-08-17 19:37:53 UTC to 2014-07-22 19:16:43 UTC.

02468102012-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 2 submissions, 1 commentsAug 20122012-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2012-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2012-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 2 submissions, 5 comments2012-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2013-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 1 submissions, 9 comments2013-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2013-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2013-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2013-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2013-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJul 20132013-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2013-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 0 submissions, 7 comments2014-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2014-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2014-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2014-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2014-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 2014

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Aug 20122012-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-09-01 00:00:00 UTC321
Sep 20122012-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20122012-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20122012-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-12-01 00:00:00 UTC725
Dec 20122012-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Jan 20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-02-01 00:00:00 UTC303
Feb 20132013-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-03-01 00:00:00 UTC1019
Mar 20132013-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-04-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Apr 20132013-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-05-01 00:00:00 UTC202
May 20132013-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-06-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Jun 20132013-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-07-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Jul 20132013-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20132013-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20132013-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20132013-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20132013-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-12-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Dec 20132013-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Jan 20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-02-01 00:00:00 UTC707
Feb 20142014-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-03-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 20142014-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-04-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Apr 20142014-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-05-01 00:00:00 UTC101
May 20142014-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-06-01 00:00:00 UTC404
Jun 20142014-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20142014-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-08-01 00:00:00 UTC101

From the project README

An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 13, 2026.

Read the project’s introduction
Balanced API Specification This repository contains an executable specification of the Balanced API. The goal of this repository is two-fold. First, to ensure that the API is working according to the spec. Second, to provide a place to have discussions around the API as a product. An Executable Specification Specifications don't matter if they're not followed. Therefore, this specification is executable, so we can ensure conformance to the spec. There are more details in the README file inside the features directory, but to run these tests yourself, simply: $ git clone https://github.com/balanced/balanced-api.git $ cd balanced-api $ bundle $ bin/rake cucumber This requires Ruby. We run the changes with Ruby 2.0, but other versions will probably work as well. Let us know if you have any problems running these specs, and we'd be happy to help. If you're working on a new scenario, the 'focus' task is useful. Tag a scenario with @focus, and then run bin/rake focus. It will only run that single scenario. Discussions around changes Speaking of issues, that's the second purpose of this repository. If you would like to see a new feature implemented in the Balanced API, please open an issue and we'll discuss it. For example, one of our biggest requests is to support non-USD currencies. Here is the issue with the discussion, and when we support this feature, we close the issue via a pull request that implements the specification, and then everyone on the issue gets notified. Sometimes, Issues are great for collecting feedback, as well. For example, all implementation of the current framework was done via PR, and some issues need more explanation around use cases by those who want the feature, like Bitcoin support. We try to do as much 'internal' discussion in these issues as well, it's not just for public feedback. If you want to know what we're thinking, just search for a relevant issue! Edit field descriptions for scenarios Field descriptions are from balanced.rev1.json, which are generated from balanced-api. The "forms" used in balanced-docs are assembled from parameters supplied in the scenarios in balanced-api. Those scenarios should be updated to include the fields missing the specific scenario section and a newly generated balanced.rev1.json be committed into the docs. To generate balanced.rev1.json in balanced-api run: bundle exec rake features:all DO NOT run bundle exec rake parallel:features doing so causes the file to overwrite itself.
Read the full README on GitHub

What Hacker News says

7 sources
Steve from Balanced here. I'm in charge of the API. You can look at this comparison in a few ways. We share a lot of the same investors: Both YC, SV Angel, a16z, etc. They've gotten a lot more funding than we have, and so have a bigger team. You get paid faster with Balanced: we have _same day_ payouts to Wells Fargo customers, and _next day_ payouts to any other bank. Stripe is seven days. Feature wise, we provide a lot of the same things, but Balanced has more. We support ACH debits AND credits, for example, and Stripe only supports credits. We're soon adding push-to-card as well. We have escrow, and let you choose how long to hold funds in it. Speaking of escrow, in general, we have lots of extra features for marketplaces, since that's our bread and butter. Stripe now has a marketplace product, Connect, but it basically requires all of
Read the rest
your sellers to sign up for Stripe. Our customers tell us that white label is important, and so Balanced is 100% white labeled. We individually underwrite all sellers, and we give you full control over your descriptor, on a per-transaction basis. Our fee structure is 100% transparent, and the same for everyone. You can negotiate with Stripe on your rates, ours are just published publicly: https://www.balancedpayments.com/pricing In general, Balanced is striving to be as open and transparent as possible: new feature discussion is done in the open, on GitHub. As I just mentioned, our pricing is transparent. We're working with Gittip and several other companies to start the Open Company Initiative[1] to help promote general open-ness. Loving that internal transparency from Stripe with their emails. [2] To say some more good things about Stripe, they have launched in a few places internationally, and we are still US only. We can accept foreign credit cards, but merchants need to be in the US.[3] Hoping to fix that, regulations are hard. Stripe has a loyal fanbase for a reason: they do a great job. I really appreciate the clarity of their docs, for example. Patrick, I know you're as much of an HN junkie as I am: congrats on the raise. Let's all keep dragging the payments industry kicking and screaming into the future. ;) Here's some links from others, comparing the two of us: * http://blog.localon.com/2013/11/21/why-we-switched-from-stri... * http://blog.apixchange.com/2013/10/why-api-xchange-uses-bala... * http://www.quora.com/Balanced/How-does-Balanced-compare-agai... * http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14289347/stripe-vs-balanc... As always, you can reach me here on at steve@balancedpayments.com to talk about any of this more. 1: http://opencompany.biz , though we just chipped in for .org: https://github.com/opencompany/www.opencompany.org/issues/59 2: https://stripe.com/blog/email-transparency 3: https://github.com/balanced/balanced-api/issues/23
In Payments Startup Stripe (YC S10) Joins the Billion Dollar Club
Gotcha. Thanks, I thought you meant sending BTC to cards somehow. Cryptocurrency exchange is currently against our terms, "Prohibited Transactions" -> "(18) currency exchanges or dealers" and "(49) virtual currency or credits that can be monetized, re-sold or converted to physical or digital goods or services or otherwise exit the virtual world," in https://www.balancedpayments.com/terms/selleragreement . This is due to our upstream providers. We're interested in working with them to work around such things, but haven't been able to yet: https://github.com/balanced/balanced-api/issues/204 I've been heavily involved in Dogecoin, and I'd love to see BTC/LTC/DOGE payments, but there's a lot of unresolved questions.
In Balanced Will Release an API to Push Money to Debit Cards
Hi rbitton, Balanced employee here. >> I found the process of actually taking and charging a card to be a bit cumbersome with having to tokenize the card (wait for response), create the customer record (wait for response), associate the card token (wait for response), and finally create the debit (wait for response). Couldn't agree more. Tracking this issue here: https://github.com/balanced/balanced-api/issues/472. We will have news very shortly on some changes that you might be interested in. >> I also like Stripe's two-factor authentication support. This is already done AFAIK. Email me directly -- m@balancedpayments.com >> And, on another note, I was a bit disappointed with both Balanced and Stripe's iOS libraries. They only support tokenizing a card. Though this is likely going to be the bulk of use by many people it meant creating eve
Read the rest
rything else from scratch. May I ask that you open a github issue on https://github.com/balanced/balanced-ios with exactly what you're looking for? Thank you very much.
In Stripe adds multiple account support

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.