HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
basic-gongfu
cixl
HISTORICAL RECORD2017–2018
basic-gongfu / cixl · Not publicly available

cixl

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

4Distinct people
46Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 5:03:38 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month46 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-12-26 01:42:58 UTC to 2018-08-11 17:20:04 UTC.

0510152017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 6 submissions, 1 commentsDec 20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 17 mentions; 13 submissions, 4 comments2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 4 submissions, 0 commentsApr 20182018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 12 mentions; 6 submissions, 6 comments2018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsAug 2018

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Dec 20172017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC761
Jan 20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC17134
Feb 20182018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Mar 20182018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC312
Apr 20182018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC440
May 20182018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC1266
Jun 20182018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20182018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20182018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-09-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

17 sources
As far as books go; K&R contains a lot of wisdom despite it's apparent simplicity; and the language hasn't really changed that much since last edition. But to answer some of your questions: CMake is by far the most convenient build tool I've come across for C so far, the link below will give you an idea of how it looks. I find linters mostly a waste of time , but I run all my tests through valgrind before committing; I don't miss programming in C without valgrind at all; it's also an excellent profiler in combination with KCacheGrind. For testing, simple functions and bit of macro magic on top goes pretty far; C programmers tend to value simplicity, you won't find that many epic unit testing adventure frameworks out there. clang or gcc doesn't really matter, I prefer clang's error messages; and both support GNU extensions, which solve mos
Read the rest
t of the boring problems with coding in C. https://github.com/basic-gongfu/cixl/blob/master/CMakeLists....
In Brushing up on operating systems and C programming
Will recommending my own project get me hell-voted? Cixl is a straight forward 3-stage (parse/compile/eval) interpreter that is designed to be as fast as possible without compromising on simplicity, transparency and flexibility. The codebase has no external dependencies and is currently hovering around 7 kloc including tests and standard library. There are some articles explaining design decisions, but I've been mostly busy with code. The code should be perfectly readable though, and contains plenty of good ideas distilled from 32 years of daily practice. https://github.com/basic-gongfu/cixl https://github.com/basic-gongfu/cixl/tree/master/devlog
In Brushing up on operating systems and C programming

Showing the 15 most recent of 17 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.