HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
bazaar-org
bazaar
C2025–2026
bazaar-org / bazaar · Archived

bazaar

Moved to https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/bazaar

Explore on GitHubRead Hacker News discussions
4Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.6KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Moved to https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/bazaar

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-09-21 15:27:23 UTC to 2026-02-10 21:43:58 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012025-09-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 152025-09-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-09-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-10-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-10-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-10-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-10-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-10-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-10-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-10-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-10-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-11-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-11-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-11-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-11-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-11-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-11-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-11-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-11-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsNov 242025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-12-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2025-12-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-12-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-12-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-12-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-12-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-12-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-12-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsFeb 9

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Sep 152025-09-15 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-22 00:00:00 UTC101
Sep 222025-09-22 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 292025-09-29 00:00:00 UTC2025-10-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 62025-10-06 00:00:00 UTC2025-10-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 132025-10-13 00:00:00 UTC2025-10-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 202025-10-20 00:00:00 UTC2025-10-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 272025-10-27 00:00:00 UTC2025-11-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 32025-11-03 00:00:00 UTC2025-11-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 102025-11-10 00:00:00 UTC2025-11-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 172025-11-17 00:00:00 UTC2025-11-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 242025-11-24 00:00:00 UTC2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Dec 12025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-12-08 00:00:00 UTC110
Dec 82025-12-08 00:00:00 UTC2025-12-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 152025-12-15 00:00:00 UTC2025-12-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 222025-12-22 00:00:00 UTC2025-12-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 292025-12-29 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 52026-01-05 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 122026-01-12 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 192026-01-19 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 262026-01-26 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 22026-02-02 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 92026-02-09 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-16 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
cogman10·Feb 10, 2026
It seems like your experience with linux may have actually sabotaged your ability to point and click install things. KDE has the "discover" app which does what it looks like you want (including installing intellij with 1 click). [1] There's also bazaar for gnome which offers similar things [2] Ubuntu also offers the "snap store" which similarly offers a 1 click install of apps. [3] The mistake you made is going directly to the app distributors for installation. Because there's no unified linux it's impossible for app distributors to offer a single way to install their apps. They can't count on your PC having anything. That's why intellij distributes with a tar. This, however, is typical in linux. Using a package manager is how you do things in standard linux, those package managers have just been typically ran by the command line. [1]
Read the rest
https://apps.kde.org/discover/ [2] https://github.com/kolunmi/bazaar [3] https://ubuntu.com/blog/trust-and-security-in-the-snap-store
In The switch to Linux and the beginning of my self-hosting journey
jcastro·Sep 21, 2025
Co-maintainer here. I dogfooded Silverblue for about 2 years before deciding to do this. Initially Bluefin was just a "fix me script" that did the usual bits. When bootc came around this let me put that script in GitHub CI and then just consume the fixes I want. A few of us started to do this and then since a bunch of us were kubernetes nerds we defaulted into "let's make this together." Here are some of the changes: - We add all the codecs, and drivers in the build step so the user never has to care. - We turn on automatic updates by default, these are silent - We remove Fedora's broken flatpak remote and go full Flathub out of the box - We handle major version updates for you in CI, there's no "distro release day" update that's just a normal update that day - Since we use bootc it's easy for people to FROM any of our images and make a c
Read the rest
ustom build, and we ship a template for anyone to do so: https://github.com/ublue-os/image-template - You can turn on "developer mode" which gives you vscode with devcontainers, docker, incus, etc in addition to podman. - We integrate homebrew out of the box for package management for the CLI, flathub handles the GUI packages - we don't want to be a distro, in this world the base image is a base image and my relationship is with brew and flathub. I don't need or want to have a relationship with my OS. - We gate kernel versions to avoid regressions, so we can avoid certain releases or "ride it out" until fixes are published. - We ship [Bazaar](https://github.com/kolunmi/bazaar) - which is a flatpak only store designed for performance. Since the OS is a different layer we can throw away all those packagekit jankfests and start from scratch. As for the desktop, I worked on Ubuntu for about a decade and wasn't happy with the direction Ubuntu was going at the time. Fedora had rpm-ostree/bootc but didn't know what to do with it so they were just sitting on the tech. So I just combined them, the desktop has an Ubuntu-like layout and vibe. The clear benefit is that you have one image for everything, whereas local layering in Silverblue doesn't really make sense to me anymore, if you want to handle a bunch of local packages just use a traditional distro. Because doing that in Silverblue breaks just as often as it does in package distros. Pure image mode is the strongest benefit. It's 2025 I refuse to do "post installation crap" that should be automated, bootc lets me do that! More info here since I'm leaving out a bunch of stuff: https://docs.projectbluefin.io/introduction
In Bluefin LTS Is Released

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.