HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
binaryage
chromex-sample
Clojure2018–2018
binaryage / chromex-sample · Archived

chromex-sample

An example Chrome extension using Chromex library (ClojureScript)

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
53GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

An example Chrome extension using Chromex library (ClojureScript)

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 12:54:37 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-02-06 17:46:51 UTC to 2018-02-07 11:39:18 UTC.

012018-02-06 17:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-06 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsFeb 6, 17:002018-02-06 18:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-06 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-06 19:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-06 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-06 20:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-06 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-06 21:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-06 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-06 22:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-06 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-06 23:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-07 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-07 01:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-07 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-07 02:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-07 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 7, 02:002018-02-07 03:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-07 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-07 04:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-07 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-07 05:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-07 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-07 06:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-07 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-07 07:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-07 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-07 08:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-07 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-07 09:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-07 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-07 10:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-07 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-07 11:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-07 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsFeb 7, 11:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Feb 6, 17:002018-02-06 17:00:00 UTC2018-02-06 18:00:00 UTC101
Feb 6, 18:002018-02-06 18:00:00 UTC2018-02-06 19:00:00 UTC000
Feb 6, 19:002018-02-06 19:00:00 UTC2018-02-06 20:00:00 UTC000
Feb 6, 20:002018-02-06 20:00:00 UTC2018-02-06 21:00:00 UTC000
Feb 6, 21:002018-02-06 21:00:00 UTC2018-02-06 22:00:00 UTC000
Feb 6, 22:002018-02-06 22:00:00 UTC2018-02-06 23:00:00 UTC000
Feb 6, 23:002018-02-06 23:00:00 UTC2018-02-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 7, 00:002018-02-07 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-07 01:00:00 UTC000
Feb 7, 01:002018-02-07 01:00:00 UTC2018-02-07 02:00:00 UTC000
Feb 7, 02:002018-02-07 02:00:00 UTC2018-02-07 03:00:00 UTC000
Feb 7, 03:002018-02-07 03:00:00 UTC2018-02-07 04:00:00 UTC000
Feb 7, 04:002018-02-07 04:00:00 UTC2018-02-07 05:00:00 UTC000
Feb 7, 05:002018-02-07 05:00:00 UTC2018-02-07 06:00:00 UTC000
Feb 7, 06:002018-02-07 06:00:00 UTC2018-02-07 07:00:00 UTC000
Feb 7, 07:002018-02-07 07:00:00 UTC2018-02-07 08:00:00 UTC000
Feb 7, 08:002018-02-07 08:00:00 UTC2018-02-07 09:00:00 UTC000
Feb 7, 09:002018-02-07 09:00:00 UTC2018-02-07 10:00:00 UTC000
Feb 7, 10:002018-02-07 10:00:00 UTC2018-02-07 11:00:00 UTC000
Feb 7, 11:002018-02-07 11:00:00 UTC2018-02-07 12:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
I'm still working out the kinks in the workflow. I believe it is possible to use Figwheel while writing browser extensions [0], but I haven't set that up. I have `lein cljsbuild auto` running in the background to automatically recompile the JS when I change the source code, and use Mozilla's web-ext utility [1] to automatically reload the web extension once the JS has compiled. This system has some disadvantages, though. The main one is the glacial feedback loop - due to strict CSP restrictions in web extensions, I had trouble compiling the CLJS with {:optimizations :none}, so each save-compile-reload cycle takes ~30 seconds from when I save the source file to when I see the results of the change in the browser. I also did not figure out how to set up a REPL environment connected to the code running in the web extension. Lots of room for
Read the rest
In Show HN: Browser extension to read HN comments for any url, in ClojureScript

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.