HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
bitpay
copay
OPEN SOURCE2015–2022
bitpay / copay

copay

Copay wallet is now Bitpay Wallet.

4Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
212GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Copay wallet is now Bitpay Wallet.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 12:54:37 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-05-07 09:50:43 UTC to 2022-10-04 17:54:46 UTC.

012015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2022

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
Here is some code on GitHub that does call site checking using SemGrep: https://github.com/lunasec-io/lunasec/blob/master/lunatrace/... (Note: I helped write that. We're building a similar service to the r2c one.) You're right that patching is hard because of opaque package diffs. I've seen some tools coming out like Socket.dev which show a diff between versions. https://socket.dev/npm/package/react/versions But, that said, this is still a hard problem to solve and it's happened before that malware[0][1] has been silently shipped because of how opaque packages are. 0: https://web.archive.org/web/20201221173112/https://github.co... 1: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2018/11/27/fake-developer-s...
In Ignore 98% of dependency alerts: introducing Semgrep Supply Chain
I understand is a label, but some bad devs might use it as a way of matching the user, and end users might get confused especially when you can write any email as there is no verification for it in place. Let them choose it, or you make the first one to speed up the process and let them edit it if they don't like "Account 1". In terms of master password, what do you think is easier to write down as a backup? This: ?A[ZSOO{PBs&Y]5.6iwm=_t}]t<DOk Or this: remove maple runway unable empty little swing zebra lava interest secret admit To create this you can even use the bitcoin libraries, so you don't have to write your own, and you will only need to work on the clients. If you do it similar to what Trezor did but on a desktop app, you're protocol is built for the web pretty fast. If is good for money is definitely good for Facebook/Twitter/w
Read the rest
hatever. If you don't have a lot of experience with bitcoin, you can try to use https://copay.io/ is cross-platform, open source and very secure. Exactly what you're after from my understanding. You can even change this remove all the bitcoin wallet stuff and make it as an authentication app. It generates the words for you and forces you to back them up to avoid any pain later on. This follows all the principles mentioned. P.S. This version is visually better imo https://github.com/bitpay/copay/releases/tag/v2.7.0
In SecureLogin Authentication Protocol 1.0

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.