HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
blakemcbride
eclipse-lisp
C2015–2018
blakemcbride / eclipse-lisp

eclipse-lisp

Eclipse Common Lisp

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
100GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Eclipse Common Lisp

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-04-07 14:00:41 UTC to 2018-05-12 13:41:32 UTC.

0122015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2018

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211

What Hacker News says

3 sources
> I think lisp did (to a lesser extent still do) suffer from the "whole system syndrome There are a bunch of problems of Lisp for systems/application programming: * dynamic typing and dealing with runtime errors * garbage collection vs. real-time response * amount of memory used is usually higher for GCed systems * interoperability with C code and code in other languages * abstraction mismatch between C code and Lisp code. * the need for a foreign function interface to inter-operate with C code * the integration with C++ * the minimum size of a program and how many programs can be started * sharing much of the runtime and library When people started to write lots of Lisp code (80s) then the question of delivery came up. The were a bunch of responses to that: * don't run systems and applications in Lisp, for exampl
Read the rest
e rewrite the Lisp applications into C++ (smaller footprint, possibly faster execution, ...) * develop new Lisp-like programming languages, but which are more efficient to implement. Example: Apple's Dylan or see Dynace ( https://github.com/blakemcbride/Dynace ) * develop special Lisp implementations which address the above issues and are specialized in application delivery Let's look at the latter approach. Germany had for example the Apply project which for example created the CLICC compiler ( https://www.informatik.uni-kiel.de/~wg/clicc.html ). CLICC is a whole-program compiler for a restricted subset of Common Lisp. mocl is based on CLICC and was/is a commercial CL compiler for macOS X, Android and iOS. There are a bunch of similar compilers (Thinlisp is one https://www.cliki.net/ThinLisp ). Many years ago Oracle also bought an Lisp compiler (which was very expensive for users, IIRC in the range of $100k), which actually generated 'maintainable' C code. Another interesting system is WCL: https://github.com/wadehennessey/wcl WCL allows one to use Common Lisp as a shared library (mostly). Each Lisp application starts with tiny RAM usage and tiny application size. This allows to run possibly hundreds of smallish Lisp applications at the same time. Eclipse was a Common Lisp which has a direct integration in C and compilation to C, which made something like a Foreign Function interface unnecessary: https://github.com/blakemcbride/eclipse-lisp Generally these tools are often 'old', not widely used and not many applications have been written with them.
In Common Lisp homepage

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.