HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
borisrepl
boris
PHP2012–2016
borisrepl / boris

boris

A tiny REPL for PHP

8Distinct people
9Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
2.1KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A tiny REPL for PHP

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year9 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2012-12-31 02:56:17 UTC to 2016-07-14 17:57:06 UTC.

012342012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20122013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 2 submissions, 2 comments2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20122012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC422
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

9 sources
I'd wonder why they're pressuring you to move to PHP. I've written PHP in the past, and recently started maintaining a site in PHP through a company acquisition. Normally I prefer Ruby on Rails and have used it since Rails v1.2.3. I consider PHP to be a step backwards technology and tooling wise. Laravel seems like the nicest copy of Rails, but it seems like everything nice in PHP is a crude copy of something from the Ruby/Rails ecosystems. Frequently in PHP I found myself missing a proper REPL, yes PHP can be run interactively with `$ php -a`, but it doesn't print the last returned value, so spelunking in a running system is slow and awkward, luckily I've found Boris(https://github.com/borisrepl/boris) which is more like IRB or Pry, but it's still unpleasant when I'm trying to kill a tricky bug. On the package management front Composer i
Read the rest
s a better solution than previous PHP offerings, but it's got some quirks that make it seem unpolished compared to Bundler. If I was given a choice PHP I would never willingly pick PHP. I suspect your company is pressuring you to move because they think they can get PHP devs at a lower cost than Ruby devs. If you're in the Bay Area there are plenty of companies that will hire you to write Ruby so you don't really have to switch if you're not comfortable with it.
In Ask HN: Ruby Dev, is moving to PHP a step backward career wise?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.