HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
brillout
wildcard-api
JavaScript2019–2020
brillout / wildcard-api

wildcard-api

Functions as API.

2Distinct people
24Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
369GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Functions as API.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 9:01:12 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month24 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2019-08-09 09:57:05 UTC to 2020-12-23 12:55:17 UTC.

02462019-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsAug 20192019-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2019-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 1 submissions, 5 comments2019-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2020-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2020-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 commentsApr 20202020-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 commentsDec 2020

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Aug 20192019-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-09-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Sep 20192019-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-10-01 00:00:00 UTC303
Oct 20192019-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20192019-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-12-01 00:00:00 UTC615
Dec 20192019-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Jan 20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-02-01 00:00:00 UTC211
Feb 20202020-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-01 00:00:00 UTC404
Mar 20202020-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20202020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-05-01 00:00:00 UTC312
May 20202020-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20202020-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20202020-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20202020-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20202020-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20202020-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20202020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20202020-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211

What Hacker News says

6 sources
So true. That said, for an API consumed by third-party developers, REST makes a lot of sense. Otherwise, which is like 98% of the APIs out there, RPC really is superior. I've implemented a tool similar to what OP is building: Wildcard API [1] > rather pointless HTTP semantics. Agree. Actually, while implementing Wildcard API, I made sure to abstract away all HTTP semantics. With Wildcard, you don't think in terms of "HTTP verbs" but you think in terms of functions. Like you are naturally used to. > It always baffled me how so-called RESTful APIs became popular I believe REST became popular because it got lot's of exposure since all third-party APIs were using REST. [1]: https://github.com/reframejs/wildcard-api
In Do we need a web API?
"becoming the new SQL quickly" - Prisma, who led the way on that front, abandoned this pursuit. "Learn GraphQL" - I'm not sure you need to learn GraphQL. You need to now that GraphQL is a powerful tool for APIs consumed by third party devs, such as the GitHub or Facebook API. But for internal APIs (and more than 98% of APIs are internal!), GraphQL (and even REST) is overkill and you'd be better off with RPC, such as Wildcard API [1] or gRPC [2]. Many developers will never have to build a GraphQL API in they entire career. Only few companies need to expose their data to third parties. [1]: https://github.com/reframejs/wildcard-api [2]: https://grpc.io/
In Developer Roadmaps

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.