BRbrrrrrm·Apr 12, 2022Submission
Wasmblr – C++ WebAssembly Assembler in a single header file
11 points · Open discussionbwasti
wasmblr
C++2021–2022
bwasti / wasmblr
wasmblr
C++ WebAssembly assembler in a single header file
2Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
170GitHub stars
What to know before exploring
What it is
C++ WebAssembly assembler in a single header file
GitHub
Where it is used
No documented product use has been verified yet.
What people are saying
No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.
No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.
Also in these discussions
No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.
This week on Hacker News
Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.
No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.
Mentions over time
HN mentions by week4 dated mentions
Observed mentions: 2021-12-30 14:01:27 UTC to 2022-04-12 00:04:23 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.
Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.
View mention counts and date ranges
| Period | Start (UTC) | End (exclusive, UTC) | Mentions | Submissions | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27 | 2021-12-27 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-01-03 00:00:00 UTC | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Jan 3 | 2022-01-03 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-01-10 00:00:00 UTC | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Jan 10 | 2022-01-10 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-01-17 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 17 | 2022-01-17 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-01-24 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 24 | 2022-01-24 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-01-31 00:00:00 UTC | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Jan 31 | 2022-01-31 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-02-07 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 7 | 2022-02-07 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-02-14 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 14 | 2022-02-14 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-02-21 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 21 | 2022-02-21 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-02-28 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 28 | 2022-02-28 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-03-07 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 7 | 2022-03-07 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-03-14 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 14 | 2022-03-14 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-03-21 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 21 | 2022-03-21 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-03-28 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 28 | 2022-03-28 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-04-04 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr 4 | 2022-04-04 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-04-11 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr 11 | 2022-04-11 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-04-18 00:00:00 UTC | 1 | 1 | 0 |
What Hacker News says
4 sourcesThat's a good point: you certainly could. There's some fun exploration to be done with atomic operations.
The issue is that threaded execution requires cross-origin isolation, which isn't trivial to integrate. (Example server that will serve the required headers: https://github.com/bwasti/wasmblr/blob/main/thread_example/s...)
In WebAssembly techniques to speed up matrix multiplicationWasmblr: A single header file WebAssembly assembler for C++
3 points · Open discussionShow HN: A C++ Web Assembly assembler
1 points · Open discussion