HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
bytecodealliance
jco
TypeScript2023–2026
bytecodealliance / jco

jco

JavaScript toolchain for working with WebAssembly Components

10Distinct people
17Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

JavaScript toolchain for working with WebAssembly Components

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 2:04:58 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year17 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-04-20 04:17:37 UTC to 2026-06-11 05:03:48 UTC.

024682023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 0 submissions, 8 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 1 submissions, 3 comments20242025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC808
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC413
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303

What Hacker News says

2 sources
No, the component model proposal is not part of the Wasm 3.0 release. Proposals only make it into a Wasm point release once they reach stage 5, and the component model is still under development and so is not trying to move through the phases yet. Unlike any of the proposals which became part of Wasm 3.0, the component model does not make any changes to the core Wasm module encoding or its semantics. Instead, it’s designed as a new encoding container which contain core Wasm modules, and adds extra information alongside each module describing its interface types and how to instantiate and link those modules. By keeping all of these additions outside of core Wasm, we can build implementations out of any plain old Wasm engine, plus extra code that instantiates and links those modules, and converts between the core wasm ABI to higher level in
Read the rest
terface types. The Jco project https://github.com/bytecodealliance/jco does exactly that using the common JS interface used by every web engine’s Wasm implementation. So, we can ship the component model on the web without web engines putting in any work of their own, which isn’t possible with proposals which add or change core wasm.
In WASM 3.0 Completed
Disclaimer: I work on Jco, one of the user-facing Bytecode Alliance WASM JS ecosystem projects Just a note, but there is burgeoning support for this in "modern" WebAssembly: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/jco/tree/main/examples/c... If raw WebIDL binding generation support isn't interesting enough: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/jco/blob/main/packages/j... https://github.com/bytecodealliance/jco/blob/main/packages/j... https://github.com/bytecodealliance/jco/blob/main/packages/j... Support is far from perfect, but we're moving towards a much more extensible and generic way to support interacting with the DOM from WebAssembly -- and we're doing it via the Component Model and WebAssembly Interface Types (WIT) (the "modern" in "modern" WebAssembly). What's stopping us the most from being very effective in browsers is the still-expe
Read the rest
rimental browser shim for components in Jco specifically. This honestly shouldn't be blocking us at this point but... It's just that no one has gotten around to improving and refactoring the bindings. That said, the support for DOM stuff is ready now (you could use those WIT interfaces and build DOM manipulating programs in Rust or TinyGo or C/C++, for example). P.S. If you're confused about what a "component" is or what "modern" WebAssembly means, start here: https://component-model.bytecodealliance.org/design/why-comp... If you want to dive deeper: https://github.com/WebAssembly/component-model
In When Is WebAssembly Going to Get DOM Support?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.