HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
c-blake
cligen
Nim2018–2026
c-blake / cligen

cligen

Nim library to infer/generate command-line-interfaces / option / argument parsing; Docs at

8Distinct people
57Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
584GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Nim library to infer/generate command-line-interfaces / option / argument parsing; Docs at

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 6:36:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year57 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-08-17 23:26:38 UTC to 2026-10-13 15:14:01 UTC.

0369122018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 0 submissions, 8 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 0 submissions, 8 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 0 submissions, 10 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 12 mentions; 0 submissions, 12 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 1 submissions, 9 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC808
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC808
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC10010
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC12012
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC1019
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

8 sources
If a little CLI app to do something useful (instead of say, some shell script/batch file or something) is your entry point then you might try cligen [1]. Everyone is different, but from many and varied reports (e.g. in this very thread [2]), it is hugely more probable that you get up & running with some basic skills in like 30 minutes to 4 hours or so with Nim than you would with Rust. Nim really seems to "scale up gracefully" for most. [1] https://github.com/c-blake/cligen [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25596285
In Nim in 2020: A Short Recap
Nim is indeed a great answer for this. Should you want to give that script a nice, traditional CLI then you can do so with very low effort using https://github.com/c-blake/cligen Should you want "script like" edit-test development cycle ergonomics you can use the TinyCC/tcc backend for compiles in ~200..300 milliseconds. Once it's how you like it you can compile with gcc & -d:danger for max performance in deployment.
In Nim 1.4
I was wondering the same thing. Perhaps he means all the extra "fire::" annotations one needs to put in place in function parameter lists as well as the ultimate dispatcher instatiating cpp macro? Really there is always at least 2.5 with the #include <fire.h>, later macro and annotations. https://github.com/c-blake/cligen achieves the actual 1-line of code dream without extra annotations and even leveraging existing API documentation and even colorizing said rST docs in terminal generated help output. { Of course, that one line might be an "import cligen; dispatch(foo)" which is arguably denser than most people would format it. } One usually wants to add some per-parameter help, though, unless your parameter names are always much more descriptive than "x" and "y".
In Create a fully functioning command line interface with 1.5 lines of code

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.