HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
c3lang
c3c
C32020–2026
c3lang / c3c

c3c

Compiler for the C3 language

15Distinct people
31Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
6KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Compiler for the C3 language

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 3:38:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year31 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-08-10 13:27:48 UTC to 2026-09-24 10:33:28 UTC.

0369122020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 12 mentions; 3 submissions, 9 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 0 submissions, 10 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC312
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC1239
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC10010

What Hacker News says

1 sources
Nuoji·Aug 10, 2020Submission

Ask HN: Help me improve my C-like language, C3

I'm working on a "alternative to C" called C3, but unlike most (e.g. Zig, Odin, Jai, Rust etc) it tries to stay really close to C syntax as far as possible and I'd love to hear what people like and what they dislike, especially if they write a lot of C. The site here has an overview of the language and code samples: http://www.c3-lang.org You can try it out in the browser here: https://ide.judge0.com/?1EFo with the list of implemented features/not yet implemented features in the compiler found here: https://github.com/c3lang/c3c Currently the spec has a bit too many features so I will try to remove the superfluous to make the language more easy to grasp in its entirety. The syntax tries to stay true to C, with things added on top that C can't easily add due to backwards compatibility: - Module system - Generics - Semantic Macros - Error h
Read the rest
andling - Defer - Value methods - Associated enum data - Subtypes (Go's embedded structs) - Optional contracts - Built-in strings, maps, subarrays and vararrays P.S. I know the change to use `func` with functions is controversial – it's great for a simpler grammar and to make function types stand out, but is quite a departure. P.P.S. "Why not just use C?" Well, we're seeing C++ inspired languages (like Rust) taking mindshare both from C++ and C communities. I would like to see an alternative that keeps to the simplicity of C code instead of taking C++ syntactic complexity as a base line.
12 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.