HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
carp-lang
Carp
Haskell2016–2026
carp-lang / Carp

Carp

A statically typed lisp, without a GC, for real-time applications.

84Distinct people
105Mentions
2Explicit recommenders
6.1KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A statically typed lisp, without a GC, for real-time applications.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

I love Clojure, but I do miss static types. I'm hoping Carp[0] (mentioned in the article) comes into its own. It seems like it could become my ideal language. The other problem…

christophilus used a recommendation phrase. 2 indexed comments match. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

Clj.rs – a Clojure dialect implemented in Rust direct repository linkDebated

The discussion centers on Clj.rs, a Clojure dialect implemented in Rust, with the author attributing its creation to AI-assisted 'vibe coding' due to personal constraints. Participants debate whether this LLM-generated approach yields a viable tool or merely unstable code, while also contrasting it with existing alternatives like Jank and Babashka.

70 readable replies · Supporting reply 1 · Supporting reply 2 · Supporting reply 3 · Supporting reply 4

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year105 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-03-18 06:15:17 UTC to 2026-10-07 02:57:32 UTC.

0510152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 11 mentions; 4 submissions, 7 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 3 submissions, 3 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 2 submissions, 5 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 13 mentions; 1 submissions, 12 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 1 submissions, 7 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 17 mentions; 3 submissions, 14 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 13 mentions; 1 submissions, 12 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 12 mentions; 3 submissions, 9 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 9 mentions; 1 submissions, 8 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC1147
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC633
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC725
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC13112
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC817
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC17314
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC13112
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC1239
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC918
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404

What Hacker News says

105 sources
And if you like Lisp and ownership, there's also Carp [1]. It doesn't mimic Rust's features and naming schemes though. Carp is about 10 years old and has some cool demo's (like SDL for gamedev). > The key features of Carp are the following: > * Automatic and deterministic memory management (no garbage collector or VM) > * Inferred static types for great speed and reliability > * Ownership tracking enables a functional programming style while still using mutation of cache-friendly data structures under the hood > * No hidden performance penalties – allocation and copying are explicit > * Straightforward integration with existing C code > * Lisp macros, compile time scripting and a helpful REPL [1]: https://github.com/carp-lang/Carp
In Show HN: Rust but Lisp
Rich has many great ideas and he founded Clojure. I respect him deeply. On typing, however, we do not agree entirely. For a practical example of a Clojure-like language with a completely static type system (with affine typing), see Carp. https://github.com/carp-lang/Carp I don't see why there can't be a Carp mode in jank, with bridges in place to connect the Clojurey world from the Carpy world. This would allow jank users to develop interactively to start with, figure out their shapes, use the REPL, etc. Then, if they want, they can lock down some parts of the code for both performance and correctness gains.
In The Jank programming language
As an ex-clojure dev that picked up Rust, I have no interest in this as long as it doesn't have ownership. Once you used lexical scoping, you're not going back to dynamic scope either, the same goes for the ability to reason about "where an object currently is" lexicographically. I think Carp (https://github.com/carp-lang/Carp) is a much more interesting contender for a native clojure, simply because it has lexical ownership.
In From C++ to Clojure: Jank language promises best of both
While I'm a huge fan of immutable persistent datastructures, I don't think that they are a neccesity. And linked lists with reference counting are really easy to do, and don't have any leaks if you don't allow cons cell abuse. (which would mess with immutablity anyways) You could also do linear types like carp [0], or you could just do manual memory management. I feel like most people will call something with macros and s-expressions, a reasonable, if brutalist, lisp. 0: https://github.com/carp-lang/Carp
In LO – simple WASM native language

Showing the 15 most recent of 105 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.