HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
celtera
avendish
C++2021–2025
celtera / avendish

avendish

declarative polyamorous cross-system intermedia objects

3Distinct people
27Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
488GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

declarative polyamorous cross-system intermedia objects

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 11:34:28 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year27 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2021-10-30 12:53:29 UTC to 2025-02-14 01:04:20 UTC.

0510152021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 3 submissions, 2 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 17 mentions; 0 submissions, 17 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC532
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC17017
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

1 sources
I wrote a DAW (https://ossia.io) and a few dozen plugins (actually 150+ if I count the various small tests and examples in https://github.com/celtera/avendish) and I can assure you that most plug-ins don't add latency. > There is no way eliminate CPU cycles being spent on whatever the plugin does. that's not how DAW works, they don't output audio immediately anyways, everything is buffered at the driver level or just above so that there's always 1 or 2 buffers of delay between the input and the output. There's no difference in terms of latency between putting one or 50 bitcrushers in series for instance because in the end the audio main loop looks like (in a very simplified way): void process_soundcard_buffers(float** in, float** out, int samples) { for(int i = 0; i < samples; i++) // samples would usually be the buffer size
Read the rest
you set in your audio config out[0][0] = f(in[0][0]); } where f can be one distortion, or 50 distortions - what matters is that their processing time is < than the time you have to write the output and if so you'll always get the same fixed latency. (And if not so, you don't get delayed output, you get crackles because the soundcard will be reading its buffer whether you wrote something meaningful in it or not)
In OpenDAW – a new holistic exploration of music creation inside the browser

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.