HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
ChALkeR
notes
Security & Privacy2015–2022
ChALkeR / notes

notes

Some public notes

17Distinct people
21Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.3KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Some public notes

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 7:56:55 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year21 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-12-04 14:31:50 UTC to 2022-05-05 19:33:38 UTC.

0510152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 2 submissions, 0 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 3 submissions, 1 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 13 mentions; 10 submissions, 3 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2022

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC220
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC431
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC13103
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

From the project README

An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 13, 2026.

Read the project’s introduction
Just some notes, stored on GitHub instead of a blog. I am not a native English speaker, so please excuse any language mistakes. Contents Yarn transferred npm credentials over unencrypted http connection (2019-07-13) Enumerating Bitbucket repos and private issue titles (2018-05-10) On Node.js CTC decision making (part 1) (2017-05-05/2017-08-30) Gathering weak npm credentials (2017-06-21) Improper markup sanitization in popular software (2017-04-13) Short-term package manager wishlist (2016-11-03) On npmjs.com tokens visibility, XSS, and clickjacking (2016-10-18) Stealing Travis secure variables (2016-07-07) Let's fix Buffer API (2016-01-15) Buffer knows everything (2016-01-14) Do not underestimate credentials leaks (2015-12-04)
Read the full README on GitHub

What Hacker News says

4 sources
This. I love that the Node community enjoys innovating for convenience, but ideas like this one are less than half-baked from a security perspective. Just make a few typo'd popular packages, and use npm install scripts [1] and you have a very easy remote code execution vector on developer workstations. The bigger problem I see is that npm is a circus. No package signing and a ridiculous debate on why that's been going on for a year and a half [2]. Credentials leaks of popular modules. [3] When everything is a module and everyone is supposed to include modules vs. writing their own very simple functionality for things even like isArray polyfills [4] (24MM downloads a month!), you end up with the same attack surface that gives WordPress such a shitty reputation for security. It's not usually core, it's all the plugins by authors of unknown
Read the rest
provenance and skill. WordPress gets pwned because there are a lot of plugins hastily written by new developers and used without audit by mom-and-pop web app shops and/or those that trust the code because they aren't capable of auditing it meaningfully. When you use an npm dependency, you are taking on all of their dependencies. You are trusting they don't leak creds, that npm has not been compromised, and that the chain underneath has been audited for malicious behavior. In reality this is impractical: go npm install express and see just how deep the dependency chain goes. Things like Snyk are required to just understand what might be vulnerable. [1] https://docs.npmjs.com/misc/scripts [2] https://github.com/node-forward/discussions/issues/29 [3] https://github.com/ChALkeR/notes/blob/master/Do-not-underest... [4] https://www.npmjs.com/package/isarray EDIT: Ironically, this module itself is vulnerable to code injection.
In Show HN: Auto install npm dependencies as you code

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.