HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
cloudfoundry
diego-design-notes
HTML2014–2017
cloudfoundry / diego-design-notes · Archived

diego-design-notes

Diego Architectural Design Musings and Explications

2Distinct people
6Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
142GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Diego Architectural Design Musings and Explications

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 12:45:45 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year6 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-09-28 06:53:06 UTC to 2017-06-11 14:49:31 UTC.

01232014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

1 sources
A first note, this is not like-for-like. Dokku, Flynn and Deis fit the PaaS spot more meaningfully. Kubernetes and Swarm are sometimes called "Container as a Service" -- you still need a bunch of work to select, install and configure features that PaaS users take for granted. Missing from the list: Cloud Foundry. And OpenShift! Give Red Hat some respect here for making Kubernetes into a platform. And DCOS, which I think got its thunder stolen by Kubernetes. But I mostly know Cloud Foundry, because it's my day job to keep making it better. It's the most mature out of all of these, has been soak tested to 250,000 running applications[0], can be deployed to any major IaaS or bare metal, comes with routing, logging, service injection, healing, no-downtime upgrading and I forget what other headlines I usually pick out of the several hundred fe
Read the rest
atures it now includes. The Cloud Foundry Foundation includes Pivotal (my employer), IBM, SAP, Google, DellEMC, VMWare, Cisco, Suse and those are just the fancy tech names. The reason you don't hear about it is that we and our partners have focused on competing for enterprise sales. It's not how you get publicity on HN, but it does mean that PivotalCF -- our commercial distribution -- has the fastest-growing sales of an opensource-based product in history. And sales are still zooming up and to the right. The nice thing is that we and other partners get very broad, specific feedback from customers who are already at massive scale and who expect utter, non-negotiable reliability. We run a public service ourselves (Pivotal Web Services), SAP have HANA Cloud, IBM runs BlueMix. We and other Cloud Foundry contributors have had the benefit of that dogfooding and feedback for longer than any other container-based platform in existence. And it turns out, there are so many things that can go wrong. So many. It's crazy. Lastly, Cloud Foundry teams have massive investments in project automation. This gives us two capabilities: one is that we can roll out complete rebuilds of the whole platform within hours of an upstream CVE patch. Users can then apply these fixes to their platform live, in-place, without any running apps noticing that it has occurred. BOSH[1] will roll out the deployment with canaries, and Diego[2] will relaunch containers as they are reaped during upgrade. The second capability is that we are confident in making very deep, very aggressive changes if it proves necessary, because we have tests upon tests upon mountains of more tests. And again: nobody notices, except that their platform gets faster or becomes reliable under even more extreme circumstances. If I sound like an utterly biased fan, it's because I am an utterly biased fan. I've watched this thing evolve up-close for years. It is amazing. We build installable superpowers. Disclosure: If it's not obvious, I work for Pivotal on Cloud Foundry. [0] https://content.pivotal.io/blog/250k-containers-in-productio... [1] http://bosh.io/ [2] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/diego-design-notes Minor edits for style.
In PAAS Comparison – Dokku vs. Flynn vs. Deis vs. Kubernetes vs. Docker Swarm

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.